The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The graph below presents the employment patterns in the USA between 1930 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and report in the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

A graph representing employment patterns between 1930 and 2010, levels are divided between 0 and 80 and there are 5 fields that are graphed.

The datas in the graph can be segregated in two sections such as those pertaining to Fishing, Farming and Forestry and others. This gives an overview of the line graph.

Unlike the Fishing segment, which has shown a study decline from 1930 which was slightly below 80 to almost 0 in 2010, other segments have started off below 20 in 1930 and have reached upto 40 in 2010. Technical and Industrial segments stand apart among the cluster as they have reached close to 40 in 2010. The growth of Industrial is dractic in between 1970 and 1990 whereas, Technical has shown a gradual and consistent growth in the same period.

To the contrary, Sales and office and other services have remained quite consistent from starting to the ending, while touching a peek of 20. Other services constantly had a gradual fall and reached a plateau despite an upsurge in 1940. Sales had only reduced briefly in 1940 and rose.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2022-11-25 mary.ssherr 78 view
2021-05-21 Trangdodo 78 view
2021-05-21 Trangdodo 84 view
2021-02-27 sumitra gautam 73 view
2020-12-30 Phạm Thùy Linh 78 view
Essays by user Dwarakesh Suresh :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 113, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... consistent from starting to the ending, while touching a peek of 20. Other serv...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
briefly, whereas, while, such as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 6.8 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 33.7804878049 83% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 875.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.78142076503 4.92477711251 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.43968111743 2.65546596893 92% => OK
Unique words: 108.0 106.607317073 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.547539520022 108% => OK
syllable_count: 244.8 283.868780488 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.2016948848 43.030603864 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.2222222222 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3333333333 22.9334400587 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.55555555556 5.23603664747 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.155997818697 0.215688989381 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0600247963944 0.103423049105 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0832042375397 0.0843802449381 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108153860962 0.15604864568 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102159798966 0.0819641961636 125% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 13.2329268293 85% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 76.56 61.2550243902 125% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.3012195122 74% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.44 11.4140731707 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.06136585366 108% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.