The road routes to the town hospital between 2007 and 2010 are revealed in the maps.
Overall, the circle path were added in the routes during renovation which had crossroad, connecting with city road, and the designer were built new facilities like car parks. Meanwhile, the main ring road unchanged in periods.
When it came to the northern area, the public vehicle park was established by the constructors in the north-east of town hospital, and it connected with the ring road. In addition, the new design was renovated in the center roads, becoming a roundabout route. However, there were no change in surround the hospital.
If looking in southern region, the hospital roads were reconstructed, and this experienced shape with another area, having crossroad to the city and other roads. Also, these roads associated with new Bus stations in the west side, while the employees' car park as well as the first years.
- The maps below illustrate how Frenton changed from 1990 to 2012 84
- The bar chart below shows the distribution of different income groups of men aged 25 44 in Sydney according to whether they were born in Australia or overseas 78
- Some companies have uniforms for their staff which must be worn at all times Discuss the advantages and disadvantages and give your own opinion 78
- Many teenagers now have the their own smartphone what are the advantages and disadvantages of this and give your opinion 84
- The chart shows the unemployment situation in Australia in the year 2012 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 242, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'employees'' or 'employee's'?
Suggestion: employees'; employee's
...us stations in the west side, while the employees car park as well as the first years.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 21.0 33.7804878049 62% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 775.0 965.302439024 80% => OK
No of words: 153.0 196.424390244 78% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.06535947712 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.51700396316 3.73543355544 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.60212815895 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.647058823529 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 224.1 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.482926829268 621% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 46.9254728266 43.030603864 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.875 112.824112599 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.125 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.120943914038 0.215688989381 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0591871113901 0.103423049105 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0574969603125 0.0843802449381 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0907284703066 0.15604864568 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0577124252418 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.4140731707 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.19 8.06136585366 102% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.0658536585 90% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.