The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010.
Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The map illustrates the main changes in the transport infrastructure to a hospital of a city in the period between 2007 to 2010.
Overall, it is clear that while the area around the Ring road and the City road remained the most the same, the western and eastern side of the Hospital road underwent several significant changes.
Turning into detail, in 2007, City hospital was surrounded by the Ring road which led to the City road in the south through the Hospital road. Along this line, an array of bus stops were placed while on the eastern side, there was a large land where both staff and other individuals were able to park their cars.
Three years later, in 2010, two new roundabouts were constructed along the road connecting the Hospital road to the Ring road and the City road. In addition, bus stops were substituted by a bus station which was placed in the west of the Hospital road and also connected to the roundabouts. Opposite to it, space for parking cars was allocated for only staff while that for other citizens was built near the Ring road to the east.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-02 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 67 | view |
| 2021-06-02 | chathurika2008@gmail.com | 67 | view |
- The charts below show the results of a survey conducted by a university library to find out opinions of full time and part time students about its services Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where r 80
- The two maps below show road acess to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010 Summarise the information by seclecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the number of jobs in tourism related industries in one UK city between 1989 and 2009 95
- The plan below show the layout of a university s sports center now and in the future Summarize the information be selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- The line chart below gives information about the percentage of women aged 15 to 64 in employment between 2003 and 2009 72
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The map illustrates the main changes in ...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 33.7804878049 89% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 894.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 192.0 196.424390244 98% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65625 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.72241943641 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39680686742 2.65546596893 90% => OK
Unique words: 101.0 106.607317073 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.526041666667 0.547539520022 96% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 22.4926829268 120% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 21.3235521795 43.030603864 50% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 127.714285714 112.824112599 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.4285714286 22.9334400587 120% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.57142857143 5.23603664747 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232909032996 0.215688989381 108% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.129325876892 0.103423049105 125% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0903256037132 0.0843802449381 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168184516598 0.15604864568 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.045570468327 0.0819641961636 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.2329268293 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 60.99 61.2550243902 100% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.04 11.4140731707 88% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.61 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.9970731707 116% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.