The two maps below show the sites of the Fishery village in 1995 and in the present day
The two pictures compare the layouts of the Fishery village in two periods, namely 1995 and now. It is clear that there are noticeable changes in the layout of this village over the period shown. The main modifications have included the removal of a farmland, a forest park as well as fishing facilities, and the addition of many modern buildings.
Looking at the changes in more detail, we can see that in 1995 there were a fishing port and a fishing market in the south of the map. At present, the fishing port has been removed, while the fishing market has been replaced by four apartments. In addition, the farmland has been turned into a golf course, and many trees in the forest park have also been cut down to make way for two tennis courts. In 1995, many houses have been built along the road running north to south. Furthermore, the new car park in the southeast has been constructed. Finally, the five shops opposite to the fishing market have been demolished, creating space for many restaurants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-08-25 | nobitaa | 73 | view |
| 2024-03-25 | minhnhat2002 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | Delime | 78 | view |
| 2023-07-07 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | Tuệ Nguyễn | 58 | view |
- Universities and colleges are now offering qualifications through distance learning from the Internet rather than teachers in the classroom Do you think the advantages of this development outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In some countries The proportion of older people will become higher than that of younger people Is this positive or negative development 61
- The map illustrates the different layouts of a school in 1985 and now 73
- The diagram below show the changes that has taken place in a village park 56
- The diagram below shows how chocolate is produced
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, furthermore, if, look, so, well, while, in addition, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 33.7804878049 74% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 831.0 965.302439024 86% => OK
No of words: 178.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.66853932584 4.92477711251 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65262427087 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47469837638 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 106.607317073 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.573033707865 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 248.4 283.868780488 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 7.0 4.33902439024 161% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.9153724761 43.030603864 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 92.3333333333 112.824112599 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7777777778 22.9334400587 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.66666666667 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 2.0 3.83414634146 52% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134479416886 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0613594756859 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849660637034 0.0843802449381 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123386076163 0.15604864568 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0551646799531 0.0819641961636 67% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 13.2329268293 79% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 69.11 61.2550243902 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.3 10.3012195122 81% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.81 11.4140731707 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.59 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 34.0 40.7170731707 84% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.