The two pie charts below show the percentage of industry sector's contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016
The given two pie charts illustrate the information related to the contribution to the economy of Turkey by sectors in the year 2000 and 2016 .The data has been calibrated in percentage.
As observed from the given pie charts , the maximum contribution was given by agriculture in the year 2000 as 24 % and it decreased to 14% in the year 2016 .The contribution of construction sector was the least one as 3% in the initial year .The percentage of healthcare and education remained constant as 17% .
Having a glance on the next figure , the role of manufacturing sector to the economy of Turkey was 8% in 2000 while in 2016 , it was 12% .Trade utilities and transportation had 2% more than the year 2000 .The difference between the finance ,business and other in the year 2000 and 2016 was 3% . seventeen percent contribution was given by leisure and hospitality in the year 2000 whereas 14% contribution was given by leisure and hospitality in the later year .The role of government sector declined by 3% from initial to later year .
Overall, it was clearly seen that there was fluctuations amung all the sectors but the agriculture sector had majority of variations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...key by sectors in the year 2000 and 2016 .The data has been calibrated in percenta...
^^
Line 1, column 144, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...y by sectors in the year 2000 and 2016 .The data has been calibrated in percentage....
^^^
Line 3, column 38, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... As observed from the given pie charts , the maximum contribution was given by a...
^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...and it decreased to 14% in the year 2016 .The contribution of construction sector ...
^^
Line 3, column 158, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...d it decreased to 14% in the year 2016 .The contribution of construction sector was...
^^^
Line 3, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... the least one as 3% in the initial year .The percentage of healthcare and educati...
^^
Line 3, column 243, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...he least one as 3% in the initial year .The percentage of healthcare and education ...
^^^
Line 3, column 310, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...e and education remained constant as 17% . Having a glance on the next figure ,...
^^
Line 5, column 35, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... . Having a glance on the next figure , the role of manufacturing sector to the...
^^
Line 5, column 116, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e economy of Turkey was 8% in 2000 while in 2016 , it was 12% .Trade utilities an...
^^
Line 5, column 125, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... of Turkey was 8% in 2000 while in 2016 , it was 12% .Trade utilities and transpo...
^^
Line 5, column 138, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...s 8% in 2000 while in 2016 , it was 12% .Trade utilities and transportation had 2...
^^
Line 5, column 140, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Trade
...8% in 2000 while in 2016 , it was 12% .Trade utilities and transportation had 2% mor...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 205, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...portation had 2% more than the year 2000 .The difference between the finance ,busi...
^^
Line 5, column 207, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...rtation had 2% more than the year 2000 .The difference between the finance ,busines...
^^^
Line 5, column 241, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...2000 .The difference between the finance ,business and other in the year 2000 and ...
^^
Line 5, column 294, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...d other in the year 2000 and 2016 was 3% . seventeen percent contribution was give...
^^
Line 5, column 297, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Seventeen
...ther in the year 2000 and 2016 was 3% . seventeen percent contribution was given by leisu...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 461, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eisure and hospitality in the later year .The role of government sector declined b...
^^
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: The
...sure and hospitality in the later year .The role of government sector declined by 3...
^^^
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...eclined by 3% from initial to later year . Overall, it was clearly seen that th...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.0 143% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 6.8 132% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 3.97073170732 302% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 975.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 200.0 196.424390244 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.875 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.76060309309 3.73543355544 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95337839279 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 93.0 106.607317073 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.465 0.547539520022 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 290.7 283.868780488 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.33902439024 184% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 0.0 3.36585365854 0% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 5.0 8.94146341463 56% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 40.0 22.4926829268 178% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 66.5924920693 43.030603864 155% => OK
Chars per sentence: 195.0 112.824112599 173% => OK
Words per sentence: 40.0 22.9334400587 174% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 21.0 1.69756097561 1237% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 3.70975609756 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28996453527 0.215688989381 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.193721399035 0.103423049105 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.1194777193 0.0843802449381 142% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.215144289035 0.15604864568 138% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121883536818 0.0819641961636 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 21.6 13.2329268293 163% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.34 61.2550243902 64% => OK
smog_index: 13.0 6.51609756098 200% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 17.7 10.3012195122 172% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.62 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.06136585366 110% => OK
difficult_words: 41.0 40.7170731707 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 18.0 10.9970731707 164% => OK
text_standard: 18.0 11.0658536585 163% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.