The two pie charts below show the percentages of industry sectors’ contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016.
The two pie charts indicate the proportion of various industrial departments’ participation in the developing of Turkish economy from 2000 to 2016.
Overall, in the beginning agriculture accounted for the largest share of contribution, while construction input made up the least percentages of all sectors. However, in the end of the period an economic situation changed, thus education and healthcare department possessed the major engagement, whereas the poorest was finance and business.
Firstly, in 2000 the service sector comprised 1⁄3 of total result with 17% leisure and 17% healthcare and education, whereas in 2016 the contribution of hospitality and leisure slightly dropped to 14%. Moreover, in 2000 the input of agriculture to the economy of Turkey was 24%, but in the end of the period it significantly decreased to 14%.
By contrast, in the beginning the engagement of trade and manufacturing sectors made up 14% and 8%, respectively, however in 2016 their results gradually rose to 16% and 12%. Furthermore, the contribution of finance and business with 5% and construction with 3% steadily went up to 8% and 10% by the end.
- Fossil fuels are the main source of energy around the world However people are being encouraged to use alternative energy sources such as wind energy solar energy and so on Why people become more enthusiastic about this Is it a positive or negative develo 73
- Some people think that technological advances have brought more harm than good Do you agree or disagree 84
- Fossil fuels are essential for producing electricity powering industry and fueling transportation However one day we will reach a point when all the world s fossil fuels have been depleted How can we conserve these resources What are some alternatives to 42
- Parents of fat children should be punished for making them fat. Do you agree or disagree 61
- People today increasingly use credit cards to make monthly purchases Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 74
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, moreover, thus, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.0 29% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 6.8 176% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.15609756098 0% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 5.60731707317 36% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 33.7804878049 107% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 3.97073170732 378% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 974.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 182.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.35164835165 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67297393991 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23465416419 2.65546596893 122% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.576923076923 0.547539520022 105% => OK
syllable_count: 285.3 283.868780488 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 4.33902439024 46% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.36585365854 178% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 22.4926829268 116% => OK
Sentence length SD: 24.0025508848 43.030603864 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 139.142857143 112.824112599 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.0 22.9334400587 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 5.23603664747 210% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256136735893 0.215688989381 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.105939405969 0.103423049105 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104701521132 0.0843802449381 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155658006706 0.15604864568 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119495268974 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 13.2329268293 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 61.2550243902 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.3012195122 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 11.4140731707 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.78 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 40.7170731707 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 11.4329268293 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.9970731707 113% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 11.0658536585 154% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.