the U.S Energy consumption by Fuel (1980-2030)
The line chart compares and contrasts data on the changes in the number of quadrillions of energy consumption in USA over a 51-year period from 1980 to 2030.
What can be easily seen is that there is an upward trend in almost categories with the exception of the stable of hydropower figure over the time frame.
More specifically, it is obvious that the largest expenditure was petrol and oil, and this is still predicted to rank the first place, which is standing at just under 50 quadrillion, an increase by 15 after a half century. Moreover, the second and the third highest figures were natural gas and coal in 1980, at respectively 20 and 15 quadrillion. Both of them, however, are forecasted to have the interchangeable rank with the other one in 2030. The three remaining categories, which were much lower, all started from approximately 3 quadrillion. While hydropower has still stand at the same figure, the nuclear and solar/wind are estimated to grow to about 6 and over 5 quadrillion throughout the time.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 79, Rule ID: WITH_THE_EXCEPTION_OF[1]
Message: Use simply 'except' or 'except for'
Suggestion: except; except for
...is an upward trend in almost categories with the exception of the stable of hydropower figure over th...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 575, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Possible agreement error -- use past participle here: 'stood'.
Suggestion: stood
...quadrillion. While hydropower has still stand at the same figure, the nuclear and sol...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, moreover, second, so, still, third, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 7.0 157% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 33.7804878049 92% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 174.0 196.424390244 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.88505747126 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93168800467 2.65546596893 110% => OK
Unique words: 118.0 106.607317073 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.67816091954 0.547539520022 124% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 283.868780488 90% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 22.4926829268 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.4839156092 43.030603864 92% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.428571429 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.8571428571 22.9334400587 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.71428571429 5.23603664747 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 1.69756097561 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132754345142 0.215688989381 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610047607823 0.103423049105 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.098469012132 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.112939028406 0.15604864568 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.127313272244 0.0819641961636 155% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.2329268293 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 61.2550243902 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.3012195122 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.38 11.4140731707 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.82 8.06136585366 109% => OK
difficult_words: 44.0 40.7170731707 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.9970731707 105% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.