Village of Chorleywood showing development between 1868 and 1994.
The map illustrates the growth of the village of Chorleywood from 1868 to 1994.
As can be seen from the map, there were dramatic changes in the development of the village along with the modernisation of the transport system.
In particular, there were only two main roads recorded in the map in the 1868-1883 period, with the village covering only a small area alongside one of the main roads. That original village is now seen next to the Chorleywood Park and Golf course. From 1883 to 1922, the area was expanded to the south considerably. It was in this period, in 1909 specifically, that a railway was constructed across the newly-existed area, with the Chorleywood station.
Moreover, the enlargement of the village from the east to the west following the railway line continued until 1970. At this time, the transportation facilities were upgraded with a new motorway laid in the west. Since that, several areas of the village have been erected around the intersections of the motorway and the other former ways of commuting, main roads and the railway.
- The use of mobile phones has increased dramatically in recent years What are the positive and negative effects of this trend 11
- To succeed in a business one needs to be good at maths To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
- The pictures show the layout of a cinema in 1980 and the same cinema now 59
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do you think the advantages of charging people for admission to museums outweigh the disadvantages 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, so, in particular
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 5.60731707317 107% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 33.7804878049 104% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 893.0 965.302439024 93% => OK
No of words: 179.0 196.424390244 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.98882681564 4.92477711251 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87210610478 2.65546596893 108% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.553072625698 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 262.8 283.868780488 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.4603623774 43.030603864 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.2222222222 112.824112599 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.8888888889 22.9334400587 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.44444444444 5.23603664747 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 4.09268292683 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210940449337 0.215688989381 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0959183143566 0.103423049105 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106063711507 0.0843802449381 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.165098968552 0.15604864568 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.119823512187 0.0819641961636 146% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.0 13.2329268293 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 61.2550243902 99% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 11.4140731707 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.67 8.06136585366 95% => OK
difficult_words: 35.0 40.7170731707 86% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 11.4329268293 74% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.