Nowadays, many people choose to study abroad while others argue that this will bring a lot of harmful effects.
Discuss both sides of studying overseas.
In recent days, studying overseas is the choice of many young people while others believe that it has a lot of adverse impacts. This essay is going to discuss these both viewpoints.
On the one hand, studying abroad brings many certain benefits. When having an opportunity to be trained in other countries, pupils can study in a modern and quality learning environment, which can be exemplified by cutting-edge education in America, Britain, Australia and Canada. In these countries, students can learn innovatively and effectively with modern facilities and the world’s leading professional lecturers and comfortably show their talents to develop themselves comprehensively.
On the other hand, it is also claimed that studying overseas has harmful drawbacks. Obviously, nowadays, the public has experienced terrorism and severe Covid-19 pandemic in many countries, which are a danger for pupils. For example, in America, many students who study abroad here are stuck because they can’t return home in the context of the pandemic becoming more serious in this country. These pupils also have to suffer from homesickness and water shortage within the Covid-19 outbreak, which is an arduous problem for them.
In conclusion, those viewpoints have certain truths and studying abroad has both advantages and disadvantages. In my opinion, I believe each student should take into account every aspect and promote upsides as well as minimize downsides of studying overseas.
- The chart shows the amount and quality of water supplied in two regions of the world 67
- The bar chart shows mobile usage in a country by age group from 1998 to 2000 84
- The table gives information about five types of vehicles registered in Australia in 2010 2012 and 2014 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The plans below show a public park when it first opened in 1920 and the same park today
- The chart below shows waste collection by a recycling centre from 2011 to 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 153, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...lic has experienced terrorism and severe Covid-19 pandemic in many countries, whi...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, while, for example, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 1.00243902439 499% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 10.0 6.8 147% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.15609756098 222% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 16.0 5.60731707317 285% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1255.0 965.302439024 130% => OK
No of words: 226.0 196.424390244 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55309734513 4.92477711251 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.73543355544 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90140338335 2.65546596893 109% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 106.607317073 135% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.637168141593 0.547539520022 116% => OK
syllable_count: 382.5 283.868780488 135% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.36585365854 208% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 8.94146341463 123% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 22.4926829268 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.0389237665 43.030603864 121% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.090909091 112.824112599 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 22.9334400587 90% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 5.23603664747 172% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 3.70975609756 162% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.312153933761 0.215688989381 145% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125094405986 0.103423049105 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0964742723487 0.0843802449381 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192455571483 0.15604864568 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0925030985324 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 61.2550243902 70% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.3012195122 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.4140731707 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.59 8.06136585366 119% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 40.7170731707 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 11.4329268293 105% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.9970731707 91% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.