Waste disposal in one European country (2005 - 2008)
The bar chart illustrates the amount of trash was handled via landfill, burning and dumping at sea in a particular European country between 2005 and 2008.
Looking at the graph, it is obvious that while landfills initially were the most common way to treat waste, the least used burning method, the trend slowly reversed over the four years period.
In 2005, 1800 million tonnes of rubbish was disposed of landfills, compared to only about 500 million tonnes of garbage was processed by burning. However, over the examined time, disposing of waste to landfill less and less popular, the opposite was true for burning trash. The quantity of rubbish was handled through landfills strongly fell down 600 million tonnes, by 1/3 of original in 2008. Meanwhile, the figures for the sum of waste that was burnt rose slightly to around 900 million tonnes in the same year.
Regarding dumping at sea method, this figure remained relatively unchanged at 600 million tonnes before decreasing mild under 600 million tonnes.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-05-08 | tr_h.20 | 73 | view |
| 2023-10-19 | ililmaidatuz | 78 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | LTH2005 | 56 | view |
| 2023-06-28 | linhhocwriting | 56 | view |
| 2023-04-25 | eyraen | 73 | view |
- Cycling is a healthier and more environmentally friendly form of transport Nevertheless cycling is getting less popular What are the reasons of this trend What can be done to make cycling more popular 79
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 73
- The pie diagrams show the extent of Australian optional school graduates who were jobless, utilized or seeking after further training, in 1980, 1990 and 2000. 78
- Plan A below shows the ground floor of a particular art gallery in 2005 Plan B shows the same area in the present day 78
- The graph below shows the population of particular country by age group starting in 1960 and including a forecast to 2040 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, look, regarding, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.0 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 6.8 44% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 33.7804878049 98% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 851.0 965.302439024 88% => OK
No of words: 167.0 196.424390244 85% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09580838323 4.92477711251 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.59483629437 3.73543355544 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.3733886268 2.65546596893 89% => OK
Unique words: 107.0 106.607317073 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.640718562874 0.547539520022 117% => OK
syllable_count: 241.2 283.868780488 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.5761899953 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 121.571428571 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8571428571 22.9334400587 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.42857142857 5.23603664747 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 1.13902439024 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 4.09268292683 24% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15867497753 0.215688989381 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.073033142672 0.103423049105 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0693411779874 0.0843802449381 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0873202238209 0.15604864568 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0927669148056 0.0819641961636 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.05 61.2550243902 106% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.3012195122 96% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.4140731707 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.06136585366 106% => OK
difficult_words: 40.0 40.7170731707 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 11.4329268293 118% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.