The line graph illustrates the proportion of women working in parliament during 2000 - 2012 of 5 countries in Europe. It is clear that all countries recorded a notable increase of female member through the period.
In 2000, Germany's parliament reported the highest women proportion place with over 30%. Although this ratio had increased to over 35% by 2012, Germany still had been took over by Italy with a higher growth pace from over 25% to nearly 40%.
Beside, there is a country had dramatic jump by approximately 20%, with nearly 25% persons working in the government were female, that is the UK. Belgium also reached to the same portion with the UK at the end of period from over 15% in 2000 with a little decline in 2008 - 2012. And the last country, France saw a consistent increase in percentage of female working in parliament through year, then posted a third place among these countries.
In conclusion, there were more and more women working in the government sector in the beginning years of 21th century in Europe. In which, Italy had the female member ratio highest and the UK and Belgium were the lowest ratio countries through years.
- Writing task 1 The chart below shows the percentage of female members of parliament in 5 European countries from 2000 to 2012 78
- The most important consideration when choosing any career or job is having a high income To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- The bar chart shows the percentages of the UK workforce in five major industries in 1841 and 2011 77
- As the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on road systems Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss both these views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 167, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'taken'.
Suggestion: taken
...ver 35% by 2012, Germany still had been took over by Italy with a higher growth pac...
^^^^
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...y still had been took over by Italy with a higher growth pace from over 25% to ne...
^^
Line 7, column 252, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e lowest ratio countries through years.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, still, then, third, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.0 100% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 6.8 59% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 33.7804878049 127% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.97073170732 201% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 961.0 965.302439024 100% => OK
No of words: 198.0 196.424390244 101% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85353535354 4.92477711251 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75116612262 3.73543355544 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.4819296928 2.65546596893 93% => OK
Unique words: 109.0 106.607317073 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.550505050505 0.547539520022 101% => OK
syllable_count: 279.0 283.868780488 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.45097560976 96% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 23.6679707518 43.030603864 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 106.777777778 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 22.9334400587 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.77777777778 5.23603664747 91% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 1.69756097561 177% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.202266938709 0.215688989381 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0904729103594 0.103423049105 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531633397041 0.0843802449381 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134620411343 0.15604864568 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0665375117216 0.0819641961636 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 61.2550243902 108% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.85 11.4140731707 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.84 8.06136585366 97% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 40.7170731707 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 11.4329268293 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.