WRITING TASK 1: CHILDREN'S CHARITY SPENT AND RECEIVED
The pie chart illustrates the percentage of revenue and expenditures that a children's charity in the US spent and received in one year.
Overall, it can be seen that donated food accounted for the majority of the revenue, while program services accounted for the most expenditures. Total revenue sources just surpass outgoing.
Looking at the detail, donated food provided most of the income for the charity, at 86.6%. With expenditures, program services accounted for all of the spending, at 95.8%.
With regard to other categories in revenue resources, community contributions was the second largest, takes up 10.4%. Which was followed by program revenue at 2.2%, while the figure for other income was slightly lower, at 0.4%. Investment income and government grant was the lowest and have the same rate makes up exactly 0.2%.
There were only two categories last in expenditures items. Fundraising accounted for 2.6%, whereas the percentage of management and general made up a mildly smaller fraction of 1.6%.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-21 | Yashainu291 | 89 | view |
| 2024-03-04 | phuong cao | 11 | view |
| 2024-01-04 | AhaanIshaan | 11 | view |
| 2023-12-01 | SUSANNA PETROSYAN | 73 | view |
| 2023-11-16 | phamquanghmu | 11 | view |
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ditures, program services accounted for all of the spending, at 95.8%. With regard to o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, second, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36645962733 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8058451943 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7585760399 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0648795935946 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303983064966 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911949194899 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607966129932 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121593225986 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 142, Rule ID: ALL_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'all the'.
Suggestion: all the
...ditures, program services accounted for all of the spending, at 95.8%. With regard to o...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, look, second, so, whereas, while, with regard to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 1.00243902439 100% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 4.0 5.60731707317 71% => OK
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.97073170732 101% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 864.0 965.302439024 90% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.36645962733 4.92477711251 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.8058451943 2.65546596893 106% => OK
Unique words: 99.0 106.607317073 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614906832298 0.547539520022 112% => OK
syllable_count: 261.0 283.868780488 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.36585365854 149% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 30.7585760399 43.030603864 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.4 112.824112599 77% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.3 5.23603664747 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 3.83414634146 130% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 1.69756097561 59% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0648795935946 0.215688989381 30% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303983064966 0.103423049105 29% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0911949194899 0.0843802449381 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0607966129932 0.15604864568 39% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.121593225986 0.0819641961636 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.2329268293 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 61.2550243902 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.3012195122 92% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.57 11.4140731707 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.06136585366 111% => OK
difficult_words: 46.0 40.7170731707 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.4329268293 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.0658536585 81% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.