WRITING TASK 1:
You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The following is a diagram of the mobile phone recycling process.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words
Given is a flow chart indicating the process by which mobile phones are recycled.
Overall, it is apparent from the information supplied that there are three primary phases entailed in the process, beginning with phone collection and ending with component resale.
Looking at the details, it is noteworthy that prior to the actual processing of recycling the phones, it is first necessary for the recycler to collect these devices from consumers. In the second stage of the process, initially, once phones have been detached from their batteries, both these components are then dismantled. Having been separated into mechanical and magnetic parts, they are classified into three differing groups, namely metal parts, plastics, and other materials.
During the next phase, copper and precious metals are extracted from metal components, with the former being smelted and the latter being refined. It is also through this procedure that raw materials are manufactured and reused. Plastics, meanwhile, are either converted into lower-grade ones or incinerated to recover energy. Subsequently, the resale of components takes place.
- In many countries a small number of people earn extremely high salaries Some people believe that this is good for the country but others think that governments should not allow salaries above a certain level Discuss both these views and give your own opin 61
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- In today s job market it is far more important to have practical skils than theoretical knowledge In the future job applicants may not need any formal qualifications To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write 78
- The table below shows a survey on the preference of three age groups for different TV programs in a European country in 2012 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, look, second, so, then, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.0 229% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 6.8 103% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 5.60731707317 214% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 22.0 33.7804878049 65% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.97073170732 50% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 960.0 965.302439024 99% => OK
No of words: 171.0 196.424390244 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.61403508772 4.92477711251 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61617157096 3.73543355544 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73774164254 2.65546596893 103% => OK
Unique words: 117.0 106.607317073 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684210526316 0.547539520022 125% => OK
syllable_count: 295.2 283.868780488 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.45097560976 117% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 1.53170731707 326% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.33902439024 23% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.07073170732 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 22.4926829268 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 44.7685405416 43.030603864 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.666666667 112.824112599 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0 22.9334400587 83% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.11111111111 5.23603664747 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0874108804604 0.215688989381 41% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.035133751114 0.103423049105 34% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0362259538461 0.0843802449381 43% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0587678983714 0.15604864568 38% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0296406849258 0.0819641961636 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.2329268293 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 61.2550243902 71% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.3012195122 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.4140731707 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.06136585366 134% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 40.7170731707 165% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 11.4329268293 101% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.9970731707 87% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.0658536585 108% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.