You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.
The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Write at least 150 words.
The bar chart illustrates the percentage of the british emigration to five destinations in the period between 2004 and 2007. These destinations for emigration are australia, spain, new zealand, usa and france.
it is clear from the chart, australia has the highest percentage over period of four years. In 2004, almost 40 thousands of british people preferred australia emigration. Especially, this amount increased considerably over 50 thousands people in 2006. The second highest destination is spain that almost 35 thousands of britisher preferred to emigrate in 2004 , but it reduced in 2007 about 27 thousands people.
As is shown by the chart, the other three countries have the lower quantity. In 2004, britisher emigrating in new zealand, usa and france has the approximate amount nearly 25 thousands people. france increased its quantity over 30 percent in 2005, but it decreased in 2007 under 20 thousands people.
Generally, australia is the most popular destination among other four countries in terms of emigration.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-03 | Trần Hồng Khiếm | 73 | view |
| 2019-08-21 | Cherry06 | 67 | view |
| 2019-06-14 | Mishika sugandhi | 73 | view |
| 2019-04-01 | Tian Siyao | 73 | view |
| 2017-04-12 | Fnweakly | 78 | view |
- The graph below shows the way people of Somecountry invested their money during the years 2001-2006. 73
- The table illustrates the proportion of monthy household income five European countries spend on food and drink, housing, clothing and entertainment. 78
- The chart below shows information about the challenges people face when they go to live in other countries.. 78
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task.The chart shows British Emigration to selected destinations between 2004 and 2007.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.Write at least 150 73
- The chart below shows the expenditures of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... 2007. These destinations for emigration are australia, spain, new zealand, usa a...
^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...ain, new zealand, usa and france. it is clear from the chart, australia has ...
^^
Line 5, column 109, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '40 thousand'.
Suggestion: 40 thousand
...r period of four years. In 2004, almost 40 thousands of british people preferred australia emi...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 139, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...4, almost 40 thousands of british people preferred australia emigration. Especial...
^^
Line 5, column 306, Rule ID: CD_DOZENS_OF[1]
Message: Use a singular form of the numeral here: '35 thousand'.
Suggestion: 35 thousand
...ighest destination is spain that almost 35 thousands of britisher preferred to emigrate in 2004...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 361, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
... britisher preferred to emigrate in 2004 , but it reduced in 2007 about 27 thousan...
^^
Line 9, column 194, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: France
...mate amount nearly 25 thousands people. france increased its quantity over 30 percent ...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, second
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.0 71% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.15609756098 32% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 26.0 33.7804878049 77% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.97073170732 151% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 882.0 965.302439024 91% => OK
No of words: 161.0 196.424390244 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.47826086957 4.92477711251 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.56210296601 3.73543355544 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.93552106969 2.65546596893 111% => OK
Unique words: 92.0 106.607317073 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.571428571429 0.547539520022 104% => OK
syllable_count: 247.5 283.868780488 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 1.53170731707 196% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.482926829268 414% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.36585365854 59% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 22.4926829268 71% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 24.5307969703 43.030603864 57% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 88.2 112.824112599 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.1 22.9334400587 70% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.1 5.23603664747 21% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 1.69756097561 412% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 4.09268292683 122% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.164783351813 0.215688989381 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0719422520069 0.103423049105 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0584143739651 0.0843802449381 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103609548608 0.15604864568 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0570635199127 0.0819641961636 70% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.4 13.2329268293 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 63.7 61.2550243902 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.3012195122 82% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.21 11.4140731707 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.57 8.06136585366 94% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 40.7170731707 79% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.4329268293 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.9970731707 76% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.