The bar chart shows the percentage of adults who were overweight or obese too fat or much too fat in one country from 1965 to 2015 The pie chart shows the proportion of adults who were overweight obese or severely obese in2015 Summarise the information by

The pie chart gives information on the weight range of the adults' population in 2015, and the bar chart provides data on the percentage of the adults who were overweight or obese between the years 1965 and 2015.
Overall, over a third of adults are obese or too fat. On the contrary, a small number of adults are severely obese. Also, the percentage of adults in both groups of overweight and obese remained almost the same from 1965 to 1985, however, this number increased significantly from 1995 to 2007.
As can be seen, almost a third of adults in one country became overweight, In addition, less than a third of the people are healthy or underweight. For extra details of the bar chart, we can see approximately 45 % of people were overweight between 1965 and 1985. The first one occurred between 1985 and 1995 it was around 12 % and it reached 60 %. In the next ten- year period in 2005, there was a similar change, it means about 70 % of people were overweight or obese. Finally, the percentage of 2015 is just under 80 %.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 60, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'adults'' or 'adult's'?
Suggestion: adults'; adult's
... information on the weight range of the adults population in 2015, and the bar chart p...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 71, Rule ID: SMALL_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, use 'a few', or use 'some'
Suggestion: a few; some
... are obese or too fat. On the contrary, a small number of adults are severely obese. Also, the pe...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, finally, first, however, if, so, third, in addition, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 4.92783505155 41% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 5.05154639175 198% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 26.3917525773 121% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 843.0 937.175257732 90% => OK
No of words: 184.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.58152173913 4.54256449028 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5474858075 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 127.690721649 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.570652173913 0.622605031667 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 250.2 290.88556701 86% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 9.13402061856 33% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 16.3608247423 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.6548181077 44.8134815571 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.6666666667 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4444444444 16.8248392259 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.22222222222 4.34317383033 189% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.447851570083 0.216113520407 207% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.163312686972 0.0766984524023 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.130969718682 0.0603063233224 217% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.316116063238 0.12726935374 248% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.113758463787 0.0580467560999 196% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.4 8.37731958763 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 68.1 70.7449484536 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.7 7.45979381443 117% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.28 8.71597938144 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.03 7.59969072165 93% => OK
difficult_words: 28.0 41.2886597938 68% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 8.54432989691 117% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 8.15463917526 123% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.