Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives. Do you agree
or disagree? Use specific reasons and examples to support your
answer.
Some people believe businesses should hire employees for their entire lives while other disagree with this idea. I think that hiring people for their entire life is not good not only for businesses but also for employees. In the following, I will explain my point of view in details.
Hiring people for a long period of time can decrease businesses efficiency. For example, in some businesses, being active and energetic is very essential. The ability and energy of a 20 years old employee is completely different from a 50 years old employee. An old man might not to do his duties as good as a young man. It is obvious that if a business gives the responsibility of some essential tasks to unsuitable employees, after a while the business decreases its efficiency.
In addition, if employees know that their jobs are permanent on condition that they do their duties perfectly, they try to cover all requirements of their jobs. It causes that they always work hard, update themselves and improve their knowledge in order to prove themselves to employers as a high qualified person. I believe that it makes employees more stronger and worthy
In summary, I don’t agree with hiring people for their entire life. Because some businesses are not suitable for all employee’s ages and this can decrease the business efficiency. Also, if employee is guaranteed about his job, he/she probably doesn’t try to improve his ability and develop his/her talents
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-05-17 | Imankhatami | 78 | view |
- Some people prefer to eat at food stands or restaurants Other people prefer to prepare and eat food at home Which do you prefer Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 67
- Some people believe that university students should be required to attend classes Others believe that going to classes should be optional for students Which point of view do you agree with Use specific reasons and details to explain your answer 56
- When people succeed it is because of hard work Luck has nothing to do with success Do you agree or disagree with the quotation above Use specific reasons and examples to explain your position 67
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement Attending a live performance for example a play concert or sporting event is more enjoyable than watching the same event on television Use specific reasons and examples to support your opinion 65
- Businesses should hire employees for their entire lives Do you agree or disagree Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 78
Comments
Dear e-grader Thank you for…
Dear e-grader
Thank you for your comments
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 26, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
...w in details. Hiring people for a long period of time can decrease businesses efficiency. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 349, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stronger' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stronger
...rson. I believe that it makes employees more stronger and worthy In summary, I don’t agree w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 137, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...not suitable for all employee’s ages and this can decrease the business efficienc...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, so, while, for example, i think, in addition, in summary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 4.92783505155 101% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 32.9175257732 109% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 26.3917525773 87% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1214.0 937.175257732 130% => OK
No of words: 243.0 206.0 118% => OK
Chars per words: 4.99588477366 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.78020617076 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74484054265 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 138.0 127.690721649 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567901234568 0.622605031667 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 290.88556701 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 9.13402061856 88% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.83505154639 218% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6804123711 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.4246480997 44.8134815571 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.3846153846 76.5299724578 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6923076923 16.8248392259 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46153846154 4.34317383033 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.301215006636 0.216113520407 139% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.107224167911 0.0766984524023 140% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0979517155313 0.0603063233224 162% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.187508648557 0.12726935374 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0860287029072 0.0580467560999 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 8.37731958763 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 70.7449484536 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.72 8.71597938144 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.1 7.59969072165 107% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 41.2886597938 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.