The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant

Essay topics:

The chart below shows the results of a survey about people’s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.

The bar chart illustrate the consequences of the survey of the purchasing and consuming pattern of the Australian peoples in the five different metro.
Overall, it is clear that majority metropolitans are preferred to went to the café and take a coffee or tea in last 4 week except Adelaide. Also this trend seems almost similar in the Melbourne and Hobart. On contrast least preferable option is that peoples don’t want to purchase fresh coffee.
According to chart, the segment of café lover are highest with 56% in Brisbane, 60% in Sydney, 63% in Hobart and 64% in Melbourne, while Adelaide stand at almost 50% as equal as the category of instant coffee buyer. Instant coffee second famous category in the all cities, In that Brisbane stand with 53%, Hobart at 54% and other cities at below 50%.
How strange data shown that, all people do not want to take fresh coffee, in that Sydney, Melbourne and Hobart bought fresh coffee 44%, 43% and 38% respectively. Meanwhile, Brisbane and Adelaide both are purchase fresh coffee almost similar around 34%.

Votes
Average: 7.3 (1 vote)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-03-25 rpdesai90 73 view
Essays by user rpdesai90 :

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 140, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
... or tea in last 4 week except Adelaide. Also this trend seems almost similar in the ...
^^^^
Line 2, column 209, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[3]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'contrast the least'.
Suggestion: contrast the least
...similar in the Melbourne and Hobart. On contrast least preferable option is that peoples don’t...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, second, so, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.03092783505 165% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 32.9175257732 21% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 26.3917525773 110% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 883.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 179.0 206.0 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93296089385 4.54256449028 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.65774358864 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.50113422665 2.54303337028 98% => OK
Unique words: 110.0 127.690721649 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.614525139665 0.622605031667 99% => OK
syllable_count: 256.5 290.88556701 88% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.1296742731 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.375 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.375 16.8248392259 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.375 4.34317383033 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.125304530155 0.216113520407 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0551985157536 0.0766984524023 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0455382282984 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0841027611493 0.12726935374 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0467418362798 0.0580467560999 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 8.37731958763 155% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 66.07 70.7449484536 93% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 7.45979381443 127% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 8.71597938144 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.17 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 39.0 41.2886597938 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 8.15463917526 135% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.