Two pie charts compare the percentage of a university’s students in England who can speak second language except English between 2000 and 2010.
It is clear that the proportion of the number of students who able to speak Spanish only was the highest in both years while the figure for German was the lowest.
In 2000, 30% students were able to speak Spanish only as the second language which followed by the figure of no other language with 20%. The number of student who used only French and another language had the same percentage (15%) while the percentage of two other languages and German only was slightly lower at the same 10% for each.
After a decade, the percentage of Spanish was still highest with 35% which increased slightly. There was a significant decrease with the proportion of no other language to 10% which was identical with the figure for both French and German. Additionally, another language and two other languages figures both rose 5% to 20% and 15%, respectively.
- In spite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the world still go hungry Why is this the case What can be done about this problem 81
- The use of social media is replacing face to face interaction among many people in society Do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 78
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- Today TV channels provide man s sport show more than women s sport show Why Should TV channel give equal time for women s sport and men s sport 81
- Some people believe that hobbies need to be difficult to be enjoyable To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 60, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a able'.
Suggestion: who is a able
...he proportion of the number of students who able to speak Spanish only was the highest i...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, second, still, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 7.48453608247 107% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 3.03092783505 231% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 26.3917525773 91% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 827.0 937.175257732 88% => OK
No of words: 170.0 206.0 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.86470588235 4.54256449028 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.61087313685 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55682139387 2.54303337028 101% => OK
Unique words: 84.0 127.690721649 66% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494117647059 0.622605031667 79% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 245.7 290.88556701 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 2.0 0.824742268041 243% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 1.44329896907 139% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 12.6804123711 55% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 31.6621192582 44.8134815571 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.142857143 76.5299724578 154% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2857142857 16.8248392259 144% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.42857142857 4.34317383033 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 1.49484536082 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228362146844 0.216113520407 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125388366669 0.0766984524023 163% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0896092126508 0.0603063233224 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169580507801 0.12726935374 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0825100768963 0.0580467560999 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 8.37731958763 162% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 64.04 70.7449484536 91% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 8.71597938144 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.15 7.59969072165 94% => OK
difficult_words: 25.0 41.2886597938 61% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.