Children do not respect their parents as much as they did in the past. This behavior is now having a negative impact on society.
The relationship between parents and children has undergone a drastic transformation over the last few decades. Parents are no longer the sole authority in a family. This change has certainly affected the way children interact with their parents. In fact, many of them have become disrespectful. Since they repeat the same behavior outside of their home, it is having a negative effect on the society as well. There are several reasons behind this disturbing trend.
Today’s children receive the much better education than what their parents received. They have also become smarter and more intelligent thanks to the accessibility of new age technologies. For example, I know many young children who can use their parents’ smartphones much better than them. They can drive vehicles faster. This creates a false sense of superiority and they often look down upon their parents and treat them with disrespect. This was not exactly the case thirty or forty years ago when the skill gap between parents and children were negligible.
Another factor that contributed to the growth of disrespectful children is the rise of the nuclear family. Most families now consist of just the parents and one or two kids. These families certainly revolve around these children and it is not uncommon for parents to cater to every whim and fancy of their kids. This makes children more demanding.
In my opinion, if children have become disrespectful, it is a problem with their upbringing. Parents who satisfy every need of their children are not doing them a service. Rather they are spoiling them. Parents are required to not only provide their children with food and clothing but also instill values in them. Today’s children may possess higher technical skills and more academic qualifications than their parents. This, however, does not mean that they are wiser.
To conclude, there is no denying the fact that children are becoming more disrespectful and this is having a negative impact on the society. However, in my opinion, this is actually a reflection of the poor parenting skills of their parents and the rise of the nuclear family.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017-10-18 | Palki Sharma | 88 | view |
- You want to sell your television You think a friend of yours might buy it from you write a letter to your friend Explain Why are you selling Describe the television Suggest a date when your friend can come and see it 78
- Modern technology has increased material wealth but not our happiness To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Deforestation leads to human life in danger Discuss? 11
- Deforestation caused by human activity is happening in many parts of the world, with serious results for the environment.What do you think can be done to solve this problem? 73
- You live in an area where the local council has made some changes to regulations You believe these changes are not good for residents Write a letter to a councilor In your letter Introduce yourself Describe the problem Say what you think the council shoul 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 173, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Rather,
... children are not doing them a service. Rather they are spoiling them. Parents are req...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, however, if, look, may, so, still, well, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 7.48453608247 214% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 4.92783505155 81% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 5.05154639175 297% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 6.0 3.03092783505 198% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 32.9175257732 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 26.3917525773 144% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.85567010309 78% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1804.0 937.175257732 192% => OK
No of words: 349.0 206.0 169% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.16905444126 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 3.78020617076 114% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73845464324 2.54303337028 108% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 127.690721649 144% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527220630372 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 552.6 290.88556701 190% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 9.13402061856 120% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.83505154639 109% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 12.6804123711 189% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 16.3608247423 86% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.9979319224 44.8134815571 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 75.1666666667 76.5299724578 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.5416666667 16.8248392259 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.04166666667 4.34317383033 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.29896907216 116% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 7.41237113402 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.420857970636 0.216113520407 195% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.115601331897 0.0766984524023 151% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0542808443711 0.0603063233224 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.248547528275 0.12726935374 195% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448207816312 0.0580467560999 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 8.37731958763 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 57.27 70.7449484536 81% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.8 7.45979381443 118% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.11 8.71597938144 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 7.59969072165 102% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 41.2886597938 184% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 8.62886597938 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 8.54432989691 89% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.