The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
The provided line graph shows the comparison of the birth rates between China and the USA during the period from 1920 to 2000. What stands out from the given line graph is that China enjoyed an upward trend in 1950 whereas The USA suffered from a downward trend in the birth rates at the end of the period. It is clearly seen that the USA fluctuated from 1920 to 1930 and this happened the same with the birth rates of China. After that, the percentage of live birth of China decreased drastically between 1935 to 1940, from 10% to 5%. The period from 1940 to 1945 witnessed a plateau in the birth rates of China. In the opposite, a dramatic drop was noticed in the percentage of live birth of the USA between 1940 and 1945. In general, China reached a peak at 20% in 1950 and the birth rates of the USA was 5% lower than the birth rates of China. Subsequently, the period from 1950 to 2000 experienced a quick reduction in the birth rates of both China and the USA
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018-08-25 | lala nguyen | 56 | view |
- In education and employment some people work harder than others Why do some people work harder Is it always a good thing to work hard 72
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years. 73
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 69
- the diagram shows how fruit is canned 56
- the following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.48453608247 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 26.3917525773 159% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 937.175257732 84% => OK
No of words: 183.0 206.0 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27868852459 4.54256449028 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.78020617076 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19386487478 2.54303337028 86% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44262295082 0.622605031667 71% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 290.88556701 77% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.41237113402 85% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 16.3608247423 134% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 26.465779792 44.8134815571 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 97.875 76.5299724578 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 16.8248392259 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 4.34317383033 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.29896907216 23% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441185087601 0.216113520407 204% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24097418472 0.0766984524023 314% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984020243724 0.0603063233224 163% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.441185087601 0.12726935374 347% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 8.37731958763 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 70.7449484536 117% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 7.45979381443 97% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 8.71597938144 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 7.59969072165 96% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 41.2886597938 73% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 8.62886597938 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 8.54432989691 126% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 8.15463917526 98% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.