The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000
The provided line graph shows the comparison of the birth rates between China and the USA during the period from 1920 to 2000. What stands out from the given line graph is that China enjoyed an upward trend in 1950 whereas The USA suffered from a downward trend in the birth rates at the end of the period. It is clearly seen that the USA fluctuated from 1920 to 1930 and this happened the same with the birth rates of China. After that, the percentage of live birth of China decreased drastically between 1935 to 1940, from 10% to 5%. The period from 1940 to 1945 witnessed a plateau in the birth rates of China. In the opposite, a dramatic drop was noticed in the percentage of live birth of the USA between 1940 and 1945. In general, China reached a peak at 20% in 1950 and the birth rates of the USA was 5% lower than the birth rates of China. Subsequently, the period from 1950 to 2000 experienced a quick reduction in the birth rates of both China and the USA
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-12-11 | thaiha123 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-21 | bemoichoianhyeuem | 89 | view |
| 2023-07-31 | teulimin.06 | 67 | view |
| 2023-07-26 | trucvy112233 | 73 | view |
| 2023-07-04 | dhq.testbig | 78 | view |
- people should follow the customs and traditions when people start to live in a new country To what extent do you agree or disagree 43
- The graph below compares changes in the birth rates of China and the USA between 1920 and 2000 56
- The pie chart below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in 2 years 69
- Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information in the table below. 11
- the following bar chart shows the different modes of transport used to travel to and from work in one European city in 1960, 1980 and 2000 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.15609756098 95% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 5.60731707317 89% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 33.7804878049 124% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.97073170732 25% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 783.0 965.302439024 81% => OK
No of words: 183.0 196.424390244 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.27868852459 4.92477711251 87% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.67800887145 3.73543355544 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.19386487478 2.65546596893 83% => OK
Unique words: 81.0 106.607317073 76% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.44262295082 0.547539520022 81% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 225.0 283.868780488 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.2 1.45097560976 83% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.36585365854 119% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 22.4926829268 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.465779792 43.030603864 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.875 112.824112599 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.875 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.875 5.23603664747 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 1.0 3.83414634146 26% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 3.70975609756 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.13902439024 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.441185087601 0.215688989381 205% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.24097418472 0.103423049105 233% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0984020243724 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.441185087601 0.15604864568 283% => Maybe some contents are duplicated.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0819641961636 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.2 13.2329268293 77% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 82.98 61.2550243902 135% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.2 10.3012195122 70% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 7.84 11.4140731707 69% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.32 8.06136585366 91% => OK
difficult_words: 30.0 40.7170731707 74% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.9970731707 98% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum two paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.