Carbon Dioxide, a basic component required for an individual to breath. The graph shows the average gas emission per person throughout 40 years 1947-2007 receptively in few countries like United Kingdom, Sweden, Italy and Portugal.
There is a constant rise and fall noticed throughout these years, Nation with most population release more and the less crowded results low.
Starting with, the least number of people Portuguese, emitted 1.75 metric millions of the gas in year 1947,rising to a short height reaching 5.75 metric millions in the year 1997 and continuing the same release for next 10 years. Whereas, Italy not being towerly crowded emitted more than 4 metric millions in the starting year, excessive in the year 1997, noticed a steady record for a decade. On the other hand, countries having giant number of people viewed the most release thought. Sweden exhaled 8.25 metric millions of carbon Dioxide in the initial days later resulting drop-off in next decade and the graph kept on falling. Likewise, United kingdom the most over crowded place on earth, had over 10.25 metric millions folks exhaling the gas, hopeful, the country witnessed lowering for few years, left with 8.25 releases.
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving Discuss both sides and give your opinio 84
- More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport What are the reasons for this trend How can the government encourage people to take public transport Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 78
- Some believe that tourist destination benefit for tourism While others believee such countries negativly efected Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport What are the reasons for this trend How can the government encourage people to take public transport 61
- Some people say that modern communication technology is having negative effects in social relationships To what extent do you agree or disagree 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
likewise, so, whereas, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 5.05154639175 99% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 3.03092783505 0% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 32.9175257732 3% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 26.3917525773 95% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 195.0 206.0 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.18974358974 4.54256449028 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73687570622 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.38737639993 2.54303337028 94% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625641025641 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 288.0 290.88556701 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 48.194754642 44.8134815571 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 76.5299724578 165% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.375 16.8248392259 145% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 4.34317383033 115% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 1.49484536082 134% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.104769226008 0.216113520407 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.054161539579 0.0766984524023 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0846849508104 0.0603063233224 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0931002797047 0.12726935374 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.102885691481 0.0580467560999 177% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 8.37731958763 181% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 70.7449484536 79% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.12 8.71597938144 151% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.04 7.59969072165 119% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 41.2886597938 126% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 8.62886597938 122% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.