Nowadays, number of people using private cars instead of talking public transport is increasing and has become a trend. There are some disadvantage and advantage of this fashion. However the government has introduced many laws, which will soon be a part in our daily life.In this essay we are going to talk about the reasons and how government can encourage people to use public transport than going for private cars.
First of all, as everyone is aware about what pollution index is, industries and trash has already effected the nature, now pollution coming out of vehicle is extreme. The secreted polluted smoke mixes in air creating highly toxic air quality, resulting heavy breathing, inhaling poisonous gust of air. Secondly, the towering use of fuel is again an important source influencing the environment. The demanding usage the propellant has made the companies dig for more and more fuel by the end fuel in lower ground will vanish.
Furthermore, in future, we are left with no fuel for our children. Additionally, more vehicles on road leads to busy and filled up roads, influencing time. As per a survey most of the people spend half their life resolving the traffic, a point to be over viewed. Equally Important, road accidents rates increasing is the perfect example of exaggerated operation of individualization.
In conclusion, I strongly recommend people to shorten the utility of personal vehicles than choosing public means of transport, it saves pollution, lesser the fuel consumption, saves time, saves life as well.
- More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport What are the reasons for this trend How can the government encourage people to take public transport 61
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving Discuss both sides and give your opinio 84
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- Some believe that tourist destination benefit for tourism While others believee such countries negativly efected Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Some people think secondary school students should study international news as one of their subjects Other people say this is a waste of valuable school time Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 180, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...dvantage and advantage of this fashion. However the government has introduced many laws...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...h will soon be a part in our daily life.In this essay we are going to talk about t...
^^
Line 3, column 14, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...lower ground will vanish. Furthermore, in future, we are left with no fuel for our child...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 263, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Equally,
...the traffic, a point to be over viewed. Equally Important, road accidents rates increas...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, well, in conclusion, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 1.0 7.30460921844 14% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1615.20841683 80% => OK
No of words: 250.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.172 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84219914855 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.656 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 405.0 506.74238477 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.8948589832 49.4020404114 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 107.75 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.33333333333 7.06120827912 104% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330347663736 0.244688304435 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0938168726898 0.084324248473 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.116231142665 0.0667982634062 174% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.170083886727 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.148949467737 0.056905535591 262% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.37 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.