The expenditure on space programme to search for better life on other planet should be increased according to some people, while others consider wastage of public money as there are other serious issues to be addressed on earth. In my opinion, although, priority must be given to immediate problems, a portion of fund should be invested for future safety i.e.space exploration.
To begin with, searching for life on other space bodies could be challenging in worst case because of increasing risk to life on earth. The necessary resource such as water and air are completely exploiting,that puts us in the danger of extinction, If proper action is not taken on time. Moreover, it is crustal clear that this plant(Earth) is not a livable for the same amount of time we have enjoyed on the Earth. Thus, all the efforts to make human as multi-planatery species by government as well as private sectors such as-Tesla organisation is justificable.
However, there are serious issues on earth which need immediate attention than future problems. Take for an example of Global Warming, if not controlled the planet will sooner inhabilitate than we expected. besides, when a common man struggling for proper meal and potable water. It is not advisable to spend millions of taxpayers money. Poor country such as, Spain, spends half of their total GDP on space agencies overlooking the need of their people. Thus, budget for space exploration should be prioritized after carefully examination the economic status of the Nation.
In conclusion, life exploration on other planes will be beneficial if a country can afford it, but immediate problems should be given more priority. Overall, spending money on looking life on other planes is reasonable for developed countries compared to under-developed or developing nations.
- The Graph below shows average carbon dioxide CO2 emissions per person in the United Kindom Sweden Italy and Portugal between 1967 and 2007 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
- More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport What are the reasons for this trend How can the government encourage people to take public transport 61
- More and more people use private cars instead of taking public transport What are the reasons for this trend How can the government encourage people to take public transport Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own know 78
- Some believe that tourist destination benefit for tourism While others believee such countries negativly efected Discuss both these views and give your opinion 89
- Some people want the government to spend more money for looking life on other planets however others think it is waste of public money when there are so many problems on earth that the government should be solving Discuss both sides and give your opinio 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 156, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...people, while others consider wastage of public money as there are other serious ...
^^
Line 2, column 78, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'in the worst'.
Suggestion: in the worst
...other space bodies could be challenging in worst case because of increasing risk to life...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , that
... water and air are completely exploiting,that puts us in the danger of extinction, If...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 208, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Besides
...l sooner inhabilitate than we expected. besides, when a common man struggling for prope...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, however, if, look, moreover, so, thus, well, while, in conclusion, such as, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1522.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 292.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.21232876712 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92676610654 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616438356164 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 481.5 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6811912469 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.714285714 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.30770382253 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0926505929078 0.084324248473 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0802647194889 0.0667982634062 120% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.184158172728 0.151304729494 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0671113150528 0.056905535591 118% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.94 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.