The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant.
The bar chart highlights information about how many people visited three different museums in the period from to 2005.
Overall, it is clear that there were upward trends in the number of visitors to MET-New York and National-China museums over a 5-year period, while the visitors to Edo-Tokyo museum saw a significant decrease. Another noticeable point is that National was the most popular museum in 2005, although it had the lowest figure of three museums at the beginning of the period in question.
Looking at the details, regarding National, the figure for visitors started at just over 6 million in 2000, after that this figure rise gradually to around 11 million in 2004. Following this, that museum experienced a sharp increase in the number of visitors, hitting a peak of about 16 million in 2005. As regards Edo, it was at about 13 million in 2000, and then the number of people visiting decline dramatically in 2003, reaching a trough of around 6 million. Though the figure then recovered to 10 million in 2005, it was still the least common museum in the second half of the whole period.
In terms of MET, the trend was similar to Edo. Despite falling noticeably by 6 million from 12 million in 2000 to 6 million in 2002, the number of visitors then grew steadily, rocketing to just over 14 million at the of the period.
- The table shows forested land in millions of hectares in different parts of the world.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 67
- The chart below gives information about birth and death rates in Switzerland from 1970 to 2020 42
- The graph below shows the number of visitors to three museums between 2000 and 2005 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 80
- The pictures below show how tomato ketchup is made. 73
- This chart shows the top eight honeymoon destinations for newlywed British couples in 2010 The results come from a survey of 5 000 couples 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, look, regarding, second, still, then, while, as regards
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 7.48453608247 94% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 5.05154639175 40% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.03092783505 132% => OK
Pronoun: 10.0 32.9175257732 30% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 26.3917525773 201% => Less preposition wanted.
Nominalization: 2.0 3.85567010309 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 937.175257732 118% => OK
No of words: 233.0 206.0 113% => OK
Chars per words: 4.76394849785 4.54256449028 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.78020617076 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.55054812386 2.54303337028 100% => OK
Unique words: 123.0 127.690721649 96% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.527896995708 0.622605031667 85% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 322.2 290.88556701 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.83505154639 272% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 16.3608247423 153% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.167452501 44.8134815571 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.333333333 76.5299724578 161% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.8888888889 16.8248392259 154% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.55555555556 4.34317383033 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157725129061 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757210443006 0.0766984524023 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0405737059483 0.0603063233224 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110139456775 0.12726935374 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0369322091546 0.0580467560999 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 63.02 70.7449484536 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 7.45979381443 143% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.62 8.71597938144 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 7.59969072165 108% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 8.62886597938 162% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 8.54432989691 140% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 8.15463917526 172% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.