The graph gives information about coffee production in 4 different countries from 1990 to 2010
The given graph compares 4 different countries Brazil, Colombia, Indonesia and Vietnam in terms of the amount of coffee produced through the period of 1990 to 2010.
Roughly speaking, there has been a upward trend in the amount of coffee production, except for Colombia experiencing the opposite trend. In addition, of the 4 countries, Brazil witnessed the most remarkable growth over the period shown.
In 1990, the percentage of coffee production in Indonesia accounted for 0.2 million tonnes, which was two times greater than that of Vietnam, 0.1 million tonnes. Moreover, these figures experienced a slight rise and reached a peak at 0.4 and 0.3 million tonnes respectively in the year 2010.
Colombia was the only country to undergo a downward trend through the period. In 1990, the amount of coffee production made up 0.5 miliion tonnes, followed by a steady decline and hit the lowest point of 0.3 million tonnes in 2010. In contrast, the figure for Brazil witnessed a significant increase reaching a peak at 1.9 million tonnes in the last year.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-02-19 | Nguyen Khanh | 73 | view |
| 2020-04-28 | ngocthaihup | view |
- Some think that people should not change their jobs while others think they should because it brings advantages for themselves company and society Discuss and give opinions 61
- People are having more and more sugar based drinks What are the reasons What are the solutions to make people drink less 84
- Many people argue that in order to improve educational quality high school students should be encouraged to make comments or even criticism on their teachers Others think it will lead to loss of respect and discipline in the classroom Discuss both views a 78
- The line graph and table show the average monthly temperatures and annual hours of sunshine in three major cities 78
- The charts below show the differences in how people in 3 countries learned English in 2010 and 2015 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
The given graph compares 4 different cou...
^^^
Line 2, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ed through the period of 1990 to 2010. Roughly speaking, there has been a upwar...
^^^^
Line 2, column 38, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
.... Roughly speaking, there has been a upward trend in the amount of coffee pr...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...markable growth over the period shown. In 1990, the percentage of coffee produc...
^^^^
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... tonnes respectively in the year 2010. Colombia was the only country to undergo...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, moreover, except for, in addition, in contrast
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.48453608247 40% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 26.3917525773 114% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 3.85567010309 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 884.0 937.175257732 94% => OK
No of words: 174.0 206.0 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.08045977011 4.54256449028 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.63192868298 3.78020617076 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67146813079 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 102.0 127.690721649 80% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.586206896552 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 248.4 290.88556701 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.5076744053 44.8134815571 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.5 76.5299724578 144% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 16.8248392259 129% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 4.34317383033 144% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 2.54639175258 196% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.94845360825 76% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203858590562 0.216113520407 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0880301054156 0.0766984524023 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0922468100055 0.0603063233224 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.140167682109 0.12726935374 110% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0924314294641 0.0580467560999 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 8.37731958763 160% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 70.7449484536 95% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 3.82989690722 81% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 8.71597938144 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 41.2886597938 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 8.62886597938 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.