The graphs above give information about computer ownership as a percentage of the population between 2002 and 2010, and by level of education for the years 2002 and 2010.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. Write at least 150 words.
The bar charts show data about computer ownership, with a further classification by level of education, from 2002 to 2010. A steady but significant rise can be seen in the percentage of the population that owned a computer over the period.
Just over half the population owned computers in 2002, whereas by 2010 three out of four people had a home computer. An analysis of the data by level of education shows that higher levels of education correspond to higher levels of computer ownership in both of those years. In 2002, only around 15% of those who did not finish high school had a computer but this figure had trebled by 2010.
There were also considerable increases, of approximately 30 percentage points, for those with a high school diploma or an unfinished college education (reaching 65% and 85% respectively in 2010). However, graduates and postgraduates proved to have the greatest level of ownership in 2010, at 90% and 95% respectively, 20 percentage points higher than in 2002.
The last decade has seen a substantial growth in computer ownership in general, and across all educational levels.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-11 | poudel555553 | 61 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | poudel555553 | 56 | view |
| 2019-08-11 | poudel555553 | 56 | view |
| 2018-07-27 | rzeeshan565 | 73 | view |
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 58
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 50
- As people rely more and more on technology to solve problems, the ability of humans to think for themselves will surely deteriorate.Discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the statement and explain your reasoning for the position you take. 50
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
- People who make decisions based on emotion and justify those decisions with logic afterwards are poor decision makers. 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, whereas, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 2.0 7.48453608247 27% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.85567010309 182% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 933.0 937.175257732 100% => OK
No of words: 185.0 206.0 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.04324324324 4.54256449028 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68801715136 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92691597204 2.54303337028 115% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 127.690721649 88% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610810810811 0.622605031667 98% => OK
syllable_count: 281.7 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 1.44329896907 346% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 12.6804123711 63% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 16.3608247423 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 28.0376421084 44.8134815571 63% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.625 76.5299724578 152% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 16.8248392259 137% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 4.34317383033 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 7.41237113402 54% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315042203317 0.216113520407 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.135970188231 0.0766984524023 177% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0459862844017 0.0603063233224 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.183283146132 0.12726935374 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0589375266591 0.0580467560999 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 8.37731958763 166% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 70.7449484536 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 7.45979381443 149% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.25 8.71597938144 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.02 7.59969072165 106% => OK
difficult_words: 38.0 41.2886597938 92% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 8.54432989691 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 8.15463917526 147% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.