The two pie charts illustrate the global population percentagewise over the duration of a century, from 1900 to 2000.
Overall, Asia comprises the most of the world's population both at the beginning and at the end of the period. In contrast, other countries contribute the least percentage to the global statistic. The total figure by the end of the century grows several-fold.
In 1900, Asia constitutes 60% of the global population, the largest region to do so. However, this figure declines slightly by 6% over the next hundred years. Europe, despite making up a quarter of the population at the beginning of the period, suffers the most significant drop over time, hitting a low of 14%. North America and other countries experience no change in numbers, remaining constant at 5 and 3%, respectively.
On the other hand, Africa's contribution to the worldwide statistic increases from 4 to 10% by the end of the century, as did Latin America's. Interestingly, by 2000, the Middle East and North Africa account for 6% of the planet's populace, a figure that is notably absent in 1900. The total population rises drastically from 1.6 to 6 billion by the beginning of the 21st century.
- The chart shows how frequently people in the USA ate fast food in restaurants between 2003 and 2013. 88
- The chart below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2002 86
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices.To what extent do you agree or disagree to this statement? 78
- Living in a country where you have to speak a foreign language can cause serious social problems as well as practical problems 79
- Smacking children is the best form of discipline. To what extent do you agree or disagree. 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 41, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'worlds'' or 'world's'?
Suggestion: worlds'; world's
...Overall, Asia comprises the most of the worlds population both at the beginning and at...
^^^^^^
Line 7, column 221, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'planets'' or 'planet's'?
Suggestion: planets'; planet's
... and North Africa account for 6% of the planets populace, a figure that is notably abse...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, so, in contrast, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.48453608247 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 5.05154639175 79% => OK
Relative clauses : 1.0 3.03092783505 33% => OK
Pronoun: 2.0 32.9175257732 6% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 26.3917525773 148% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 3.85567010309 207% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 993.0 937.175257732 106% => OK
No of words: 199.0 206.0 97% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98994974874 4.54256449028 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.75589349951 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.95784033955 2.54303337028 116% => OK
Unique words: 116.0 127.690721649 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.582914572864 0.622605031667 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 300.6 290.88556701 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 6.0 0.824742268041 728% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6804123711 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 16.3608247423 110% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.6540015487 44.8134815571 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.2727272727 76.5299724578 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0909090909 16.8248392259 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.72727272727 4.34317383033 109% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 2.54639175258 79% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.49484536082 67% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.94845360825 177% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.106556855159 0.216113520407 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0386672639673 0.0766984524023 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.050202744084 0.0603063233224 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.07888886863 0.12726935374 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0565038329454 0.0580467560999 97% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 8.37731958763 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 70.7449484536 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 7.45979381443 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 8.71597938144 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 53.0 41.2886597938 128% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 8.62886597938 81% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 8.54432989691 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.