the table below give information on consumer spending on different items in five countries in 2002
The table illustrates the percentage of the expenditure of citizens in five different European countries including Ireland, Italy, Spain, Sweden and Turkey. General, most of them spend money on major category by Food/beverage/cigar and other classes such as clothing/footwear and Leisure/Education in 2002
It can be seen from first group about Food/drink/tobacco, the percentage of population in Turkey spent on the nutrient and tobacco was the highest in 5 countries, at 32.14% while in Sweden, the percent was just a half compare to Turkey, about 15,77%.There was the similar percentage of Italian and Spanish consumer expenditure by Food, reached 16.36% and 18.80% respectedly.
It is clear from clothing/footwear group that the highest proportion of Italian population consumed, at 9%. The rest countries had the approximately equal percentage. In Sweden, spending money on clothing was solely 5.40%. Respectedly, within 3 countries including Ireland, Spain and Turkey reached the percentage at 6.43%, 6.51% and 6.63%.
Spending on entertainment and education was category that there was the smallest percentage all above countries. Specially, in Spain, the consumer’s expenditure less for this group, under 2%. Others country also had the number was not over 5%.
- Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree 56
- Although more and more people read news on the internet, newspapers will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree 56
- Computers do not help children learn more effectively On the contrary the use of computers has a negative effect on children s physical and mental development To what exten do you agree or disargee 82
- the bar charts below show the levels of participation in education and science in developing coutries and industrialised countries in 1980 and 1990 82
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology. In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make? Has this become a positive or negative development? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 251, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: There
... a half compare to Turkey, about 15,77%.There was the similar percentage of Italian a...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, if, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.48453608247 120% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 32.9175257732 18% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 26.3917525773 117% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1088.0 937.175257732 116% => OK
No of words: 191.0 206.0 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.69633507853 4.54256449028 125% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71756304063 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.52937836011 2.54303337028 139% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 127.690721649 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.623036649215 0.622605031667 100% => OK
syllable_count: 313.2 290.88556701 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 9.13402061856 22% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 1.44329896907 485% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 139.535738154 44.8134815571 311% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 120.888888889 76.5299724578 158% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2222222222 16.8248392259 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88888888889 4.34317383033 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 2.54639175258 39% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.94845360825 101% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.1384085858 0.216113520407 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0631467947807 0.0766984524023 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0474437846014 0.0603063233224 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0941998963565 0.12726935374 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0637190217124 0.0580467560999 110% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 8.37731958763 191% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 70.7449484536 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 3.82989690722 292% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 7.45979381443 154% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 8.71597938144 181% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 7.59969072165 114% => OK
difficult_words: 48.0 41.2886597938 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 30.0 8.62886597938 348% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 8.15463917526 196% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.