The table below depicts the numbers of people who travelling and using three main British airport in the period of 5 years from 1998 to 2003.Overall, there was an increase of people in Gatwick and Stansted airport and a fluctuation of Heathrow airport over the period
In the beginning, Gatwick airport started the highest rate with 36.5 million people, following by 17.3 million people in Stansted airport at the same year.In the next years, travellers in Gatwick and Heathrow airport increased dramatically. Especially, the numbers of people who using Gatwick airport continued to grow at the end of the period exactly 69.3 million people. Having increased to 43.3 in 2001, the numbers of people in Heathrow airport remained the same rate till the end of the period.
On the other hand, with 27.2 million people at the beginning in the Heathrow airport and increased considerably almost 48.2 in 2000.Having decreased considerably from 2000 to 2002, the rate suddenly upward and finished with 45.6 in 2003
- Overseas visitors to three different areas in European country in 1987 2002 84
- Nowadays many people complain that they have difficulties getting enough good sleep What problem can lack of sleep What can be done about lack of sleep 73
- Table chart 11
- Line graph in the future 11
- the table below highlight data on the number of travellers using three major British airport between 1998 and 2003 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: CD_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun 'airport' seems to be countable, so consider using: 'airports'.
Suggestion: airports
...travelling and using three main British airport in the period of 5 years from 1998 to 2...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 142, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Overall
...the period of 5 years from 1998 to 2003.Overall, there was an increase of people in Gat...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 156, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: In
...le in Stansted airport at the same year.In the next years, travellers in Gatwick a...
^^
Line 5, column 133, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: Having
...reased considerably almost 48.2 in 2000.Having decreased considerably from 2000 to 200...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 1.0 7.48453608247 13% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 5.05154639175 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 0.0 32.9175257732 0% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 26.3917525773 136% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 3.85567010309 26% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 850.0 937.175257732 91% => OK
No of words: 165.0 206.0 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15151515152 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.58402463422 3.78020617076 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.66018496012 2.54303337028 105% => OK
Unique words: 82.0 127.690721649 64% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.49696969697 0.622605031667 80% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 234.0 290.88556701 80% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 4.0 12.6804123711 32% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 41.0 16.3608247423 251% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 156.404923196 44.8134815571 349% => The lengths of sentences changed so frequently.
Chars per sentence: 212.5 76.5299724578 278% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 41.25 16.8248392259 245% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 4.25 4.34317383033 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.29896907216 70% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 2.54639175258 157% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 7.41237113402 40% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.94845360825 25% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0227930482844 0.216113520407 11% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0096792639927 0.0766984524023 13% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0167649770152 0.0603063233224 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0218755044799 0.12726935374 17% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0309366351192 0.0580467560999 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 23.5 8.37731958763 281% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 70.7449484536 66% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.9 7.45979381443 227% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 13.48 8.71597938144 155% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 32.0 41.2886597938 78% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 26.5 8.62886597938 307% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 18.4 8.54432989691 215% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.