The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010.
Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
The given two maps illustrate the road network around a City Hospital in 2007 and in 2010. Overall, it is noticeable that the road access to the city hospital had been upgraded in 2010 with the addition of a bus station, two roundabouts and a separate public car park.
In 2007, the hospital road, which had three bus stops on the either side, was connected to the city road and to the ring road. Furthermore, a common car park was located on the east side of the hospital road, and it served both public and staff members. In 2010, some significant changes could be seen. Firstly, the common car park was assigned exclusively for the hospital staff, while a novel public car park was established on the east side of the hospital. Secondly, two roundabouts had been constructed at both ends of the hospital road; one at the intersection with the ring road and other at the city road junction. Finally, the three bus stops on either side had been removed, and a new bus station was constructed on the west side of the hospital road with connections to the both newly built roundabouts.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-09-29 | hongtran268 | 85 | view |
| 2022-09-24 | DHTKwithoutU | view | |
| 2022-09-24 | DHTKwithoutU | 90 | view |
| 2021-09-01 | claraa_ltn | 78 | view |
| 2021-04-08 | hanavudav | 67 | view |
- The line graph below shows the production of paper wood pulp and sawn wood in the UK from 1980 to 2000 61
- The line graph shows the oil production and consumption in China between 1982 and 2006 61
- The maps show the changes of an office building between the present and the future 56
- The maps show a road system as it is now and the proposed changes in future to reduce the number of accidents 56
- The table below shows the number of cars made in three countries in 2003 2006 and 2009 78
Transition Words or Phrases used:
finally, first, firstly, furthermore, if, second, secondly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 7.48453608247 134% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 4.92783505155 20% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 5.05154639175 139% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.03092783505 66% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 32.9175257732 9% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 26.3917525773 99% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.85567010309 130% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 872.0 937.175257732 93% => OK
No of words: 194.0 206.0 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.49484536082 4.54256449028 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.73207559907 3.78020617076 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.47291631961 2.54303337028 97% => OK
Unique words: 80.0 127.690721649 63% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.412371134021 0.622605031667 66% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 263.7 290.88556701 91% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.41237113402 99% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 9.13402061856 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 0.824742268041 121% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.463917525773 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 1.44329896907 69% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 1.0 12.6804123711 8% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 194.0 16.3608247423 1186% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 0.0 44.8134815571 0% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 872.0 76.5299724578 1139% => Less chars_per_sentence wanted.
Words per sentence: 194.0 16.8248392259 1153% => Less words per sentence wanted.
Discourse Markers: 69.0 4.34317383033 1589% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 2.0 4.29896907216 47% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 1.0 7.41237113402 13% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.49484536082 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.94845360825 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216057410985 0.216113520407 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.216057410985 0.0766984524023 282% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.225886453211 0.12726935374 177% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0758312512473 0.0580467560999 131% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 96.7 8.37731958763 1154% => Automated_readability_index is high.
flesch_reading_ease: -108.51 70.7449484536 -153% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 0.0 3.82989690722 0% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 76.6 7.45979381443 1027% => Flesch kincaid grade is high.
coleman_liau_index: 9.95 8.71597938144 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 15.78 7.59969072165 208% => Dale chall readability score is high.
difficult_words: 31.0 41.2886597938 75% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 53.0 8.62886597938 614% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 79.6 8.54432989691 932% => Gunning_fog is high.
text_standard: 53.0 8.15463917526 650% => The average readability is very high. Good job!
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.