Writing Task 1 PRACTICE - Questions - Submissions + Feedback
The table above illustrates a comparison of the percentages of primary school students faced with seven different learning difficulties in the two primary schools in 2005 and 2015.
Overall, the percentage of students in B school who face difficulties is somewhat lower than in school A. In both schools, the most notable negative situations are Listening skills, Verbal expression of ideas. , Concentration in lessons, and Following instructions.
There is a difference in the figures for 2005 and 2015 at School A that problem area of Spelling fell by five percent, from 30 percent to 25 percent. Meanwhile, at School B, this rate went up, from 5 percent to 10 percent. There is a significant difference in the numbers for 2005 and 2015 at School A that problem areas of Following instructions and Concentration in lessons significantly decreased, 25 percent and 22 percent respectively. Besides, at School B, the rate of these problems was constant (for Concentration in lessons) and increased to 6 percent (for Following instructions).
In a nutshell, School A percentages decreased significantly, and those for School B showed a slight increase in the correlation between 2005 and 2015.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-11-01 | Niharika rani | 87 | view |
| 2021-11-01 | Niharika rani | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-01 | SKN | 73 | view |
| 2021-06-11 | Julie Nguyễn | 82 | view |
| 2021-04-03 | nguyenhaianh | 11 | view |
- Describe information in a map You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The maps below show the town of Langley in 1910 and 1950 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 72
- Writing Task 1 PRACTICE Questions Submissions Feedback 56
- Writing Task 1 PRACTICE Questions Submissions Feedback 100
- Writing Task 1 PRACTICE Questions Submissions Feedback 100
- You should spend about 20 minutes on this task The figures give information about economic growth and household expenditure across a range of categories Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where rele 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 211, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...ing skills, Verbal expression of ideas. , Concentration in lessons, and Following...
^
Line 5, column 88, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...nd 2015 at School A that problem area of Spelling fell by five percent, from 30 p...
^^^
Line 7, column 23, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'A percentage' or simply 'percentages'?
Suggestion: A percentage; Percentages
... instructions. In a nutshell, School A percentages decreased significantly, and those for ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, if, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 5.0 7.48453608247 67% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 4.92783505155 0% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 5.05154639175 178% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 3.03092783505 99% => OK
Pronoun: 5.0 32.9175257732 15% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 26.3917525773 125% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 3.85567010309 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1012.0 937.175257732 108% => OK
No of words: 190.0 206.0 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.32631578947 4.54256449028 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.71268753763 3.78020617076 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35850713669 2.54303337028 132% => OK
Unique words: 103.0 127.690721649 81% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.542105263158 0.622605031667 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 282.6 290.88556701 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.41237113402 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 9.13402061856 11% => OK
Article: 4.0 0.824742268041 485% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.83505154639 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.463917525773 431% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 1.44329896907 416% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6804123711 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 16.3608247423 128% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.0419321715 44.8134815571 109% => OK
Chars per sentence: 112.444444444 76.5299724578 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1111111111 16.8248392259 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.44444444444 4.34317383033 56% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 2.54639175258 118% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 7.41237113402 27% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 1.49484536082 334% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0 0.216113520407 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0 0.0766984524023 0% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0603063233224 0% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0 0.12726935374 0% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0580467560999 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 8.37731958763 170% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 70.7449484536 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 7.45979381443 138% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 8.71597938144 156% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 7.59969072165 115% => OK
difficult_words: 49.0 41.2886597938 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 8.62886597938 99% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 8.54432989691 122% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 8.15463917526 110% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.2359550562 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 1.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.