More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing, and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poor countries. Others feel that this is only part of the natural movement of workers around the world. What is your opinion?
Qualified people always seek to earn jobs in rich countries. Especially, these employees such as engineering and doctors move from their own countries to developed countries in order to attain jobs at high - standart companies. Some people claim that this type of movement between the rich and poor countries is natural process. Others feel that rich countries are stealing from poor countries by doing this. In my point of view, workers usually move to the rich countries due to main reasons.
First of all, rich countries offer huge salary. Because these countries have strong economic and financial status. That is why it is easy for them to hand workers this tremendous number of money per month. Today there are certain programs in some rich countries for those who has qualifications in specific areas. This kind of supporting leads to trade the benefits between rich country.
Secondly, it is unusual experience which the person have never had before. In spite of difficult studying chances there, people are able to practise their previous knowledge and earn plenty of skills with working at sophisticated companies. It also allow to increase their backgrounds at their majors.
Thirdly, it is not about a country, it is about a person. That is why rich countries offer individuals not country where they live in.
All of above prove that moving from poor to rich countries is natural process. It is not expressed with stealing people country to country. Instead of it, poor country should pay more attentions at the local problems in order to make these abmitious individuals staying in their original homes.
- More and more qualified people are moving from poor to rich countries to fill vacancies in specialist areas like engineering, computing, and medicine. Some people believe that by encouraging the movement of such people rich countries are stealing from poo 60
- Without capital punishment ( the death penalty ) our lives are less secure and crimes of violence increase. Capital punishment is essential to control violence in society. 60
- News editors decide what to broadcast on television and what to print in a newspaper. What factors do you think influence their decisions? Do we become used to bad news? Would it be better if more good news was reported? 80
- In some countries the average weight of people is increasing and their levels of health and fitness are decreasing. 60
is natural process
is a natural process
hand workers this tremendous number of money
hand workers a tremendous number of money
for those who has qualifications
for those who have qualifications
between rich country.
between rich countries.
it is unusual experience which the person have never had before
it is an unusual experience which the person has never had before
It also allow to increase their backgrounds at their majors.
It also allows to increase their backgrounds at their majors.
Sentence: It is not expressed with stealing people country to country.
Description: A noun, plural, common is not usually followed by a noun, singular, common
Suggestion: Refer to people and country
Sentence: Especially, these employees such as engineering and doctors move from their own countries to developed countries in order to attain jobs at high - standart companies.
Error: standart Suggestion: standard
Sentence: In spite of difficult studying chances there, people are able to practise their previous knowledge and earn plenty of skills with working at sophisticated companies.
Error: practise Suggestion: practice
Sentence: Instead of it, poor country should pay more attentions at the local problems in order to make these abmitious individuals staying in their original homes.
Error: abmitious Suggestion: ambitious
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 5.5 out of 9
Category: Satisfactory Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 7 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 3 2
No. of Sentences: 18 15
No. of Words: 266 350
No. of Characters: 1320 1500
No. of Different Words: 150 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.039 4.7
Average Word Length: 4.962 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.525 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 92 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 73 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 48 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 33 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 14.778 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 5.339 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.389 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.331 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.559 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.08 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5