Some people think that the government should pay one of the parents of very young children to
stay at home to look after their children.What do you think would be the advantages and disadvantages of this policy?
In this fast and furious world, bringing up children is supposed to be the most challenging job for modern parents. Presently, it is argued that financial assistance should be given by administration for the one parent to take care of children by staying at home. Here, I would like to account for both pros and cons of this phenomenon with my opinion.
There are multifarious merits of this idea. First and foremost, supporting by money to parents can ensure the bright future of children. For example, one parent can not only prevent children from bad habits like joining bad company, taking drugs or smoking, watching television, playing computer games for long time but also nourish them with worthwhile etiquettes. Adding to it, exposure to a gaurdian to devote time with children will be lucrative for safety and sharpening interpersonal skills.On the contrary, its darker side can never be underestimated.
Firstly, financial crisis are likely to be witnessed by governments especially in thriving nations. To illustrate, managing money to shore up child rearing seems far cry for administration of a country like, India, where government do not have sufficient funds to fulfill very important needs of people such as education, transportation and employment. Therefore, this concept does not fully hold the water. In addition, a plethora of working fields may get deprived of handy contribution of those parents assigned for looking after offsprings.
From my notion, ''every sword has two edges''. earning money to manage astronomical outlays by both parents is need of hour. So, it is big question that how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents. Although given view holds some positives. However, It is advisable to make sure by government that they have surplus funds in account before thinking about implementing over it.
To recapitulate, governments need to think more rationally about areas to invest money according to the dire needs of people.
- Many people had been involved in sports as children but don t do any physical exercise as adults What are the reasons people avoid physical exercise How to overcome this trend and motivate to be more physically active 80
- People think that good health is a basic need so it should not be in hands of profit oriented companies Are the advantages of profit oriented companies overweight the disadvantages 57
- As English is now the world language and an essential skill in business, English language instruction should begin in kindergarten.' To what extent do you agree or disagree? Present your ideas and opinions with examples where necessary. 75
- some people want their country to host international sports events. While others, however, believe that it brings more problems than benefits. Discuss and give your opinion. 90
- Many animal species in the world are becoming extinct nowadays. Some people say that countries and individuals should protect these animals from dying out, while others say that we should concentrate more on problems human beings. Discuss both sides and g 92
where government do not have sufficient funds
where governments do not have sufficient funds
it is big question that how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents.
it is a big question on how to take care children in absence of bread winner parents.
For example, one parent can not only prevent children from bad habits like joining bad company, taking drugs or smoking, watching television, playing computer games for long time but also nourish them with worthwhile etiquettes.
Description: Not only...but also is not used properly.
Sentence: Adding to it, exposure to a gaurdian to devote time with children will be lucrative for safety and sharpening interpersonal skills.On the contrary, its darker side can never be underestimated.
Error: gaurdian Suggestion: guardian
flaws:
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Attribute Value Ideal
Score: 7.0 out of 9
Category: Good Excellent
No. of Grammatical Errors: 3 2
No. of Spelling Errors: 1 2
No. of Sentences: 16 15
No. of Words: 319 350
No. of Characters: 1615 1500
No. of Different Words: 209 200
Fourth Root of Number of Words: 4.226 4.7
Average Word Length: 5.063 4.6
Word Length SD: 2.812 2.4
No. of Words greater than 5 chars: 118 100
No. of Words greater than 6 chars: 92 80
No. of Words greater than 7 chars: 62 40
No. of Words greater than 8 chars: 39 20
Use of Passive Voice (%): 0 0
Avg. Sentence Length: 19.938 21.0
Sentence Length SD: 9.024 7.5
Use of Discourse Markers (%): 0.562 0.12
Sentence-Text Coherence: 0.28 0.35
Sentence-Para Coherence: 0.541 0.50
Sentence-Sentence Coherence: 0.038 0.07
Number of Paragraphs: 5 5