23.1.2016: Although more and more people read news on the Internet, newspaper will remain the most important source of news. Do you agree or disagree?
With advanced technology, reading digital newspapers have become an accelerating trend, but many people believe that traditional news is still considered the major source of paper. I completely disagree with this statement for some reasons.
On the one hand, several reasons explained the decline in popularity of traditional newspapers. Firstly, the most significant of which is the amount of paper consumed in their production, which leads to deforestation and fossil fuel. This is because each year, many trees are cut down to produce papers that are used so much in the printing industry. Also, delivering newspapers consumed coal or oil which are not renewable. Furthermore, the time-consuming process of printing, editing, distributing, and the expensive costs turn out to be a weakness that causes newspapers to fail to access readers. For example, US citizens spend about $30 each month only buying daily newspapers.
On the other hand, there are a variety of reasons why I also believe the Internet brings us more opportunities to read online news. The first reason is that viewers can be easy to read the new information published up to the minutes by the newspaper websites. For example, those who follow news such as political events, stock market movements, or those who are simply keen on sport have all come to expect instant communication. Moreover, you only pay a small amount to own some electronic devices that only require a click of a mouse to read what you like. Therefore, we can save more money on costly living or childcare.
To sum up, despite the fact that printed newspapers still hold an important role, I firmly support the tendency that they will be eclipsed by online news
- With increasing populations and even growing urabn centers many countries are losing their natural beauty spots What benefits are there to protecting places of natural beauty How can this be solved 78
- Some people think that it is better to live in the countryside than in the city To what extent do you agree or disagree with this point 100
- making wool
- The diagram below shows the production of olive oil
- Some people think in this modern world getting old is entirely bad However others believe that the life of old people is much better now than in the past Discuss both views and give your own opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07117437722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84680159614 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651245551601 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6623504197 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223901416505 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061114539895 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579514719302 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126065017234 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576535048154 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, therefore, for example, such as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 7.85571142285 38% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07117437722 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84680159614 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.651245551601 0.561755894193 116% => OK
syllable_count: 451.8 506.74238477 89% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.6623504197 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.785714286 106.682146367 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223901416505 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.061114539895 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0579514719302 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126065017234 0.151304729494 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0576535048154 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 13.0946893788 95% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.56 8.58950901804 100% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 78.4519038076 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.