Advantages and disadvantages when using Facebook as an online learning platform
As 2020 around, the outbreak COVID-19 turned into an international pandemic. As a result, colleges and universities all around the world are now obliging students to finish coursework by using social networks. The most popular social network among these is Facebook, it is undeniable that Facebook has both advantages and drawbacks in terms of online learning.
First, there are manifold uses of Facebook to learning besides Facebook's original purpose, which is to connect people through the Internet. In this way, the educational advantages lie mostly in Facebook's coverage level, availability, and quick connections. Next, Facebook can provide an online platform where users can create profiles, generate and share content and information, and interact with other learners. For example, the lecturers can gather students together to establish a forum and update assignments. Consequently, the students will feel immediately more connected to teachers when they have any unsolving problems. Furthermore, students to find recent topics, active discussions even when they have been absent from online learning for a couple of days.
On the other hand, some drawbacks are from this online platform. This is quite hard for lecturers to check the attendance by using Facebook when compared with the other learning app like Zoom. On the dashboard page of Zoom, teachers can see who joined the course, as well as who posted a comment or an entry to the learning journal. Also, Zoom allows the students and lecturers to learn face-to-face and up to 100+ can join the meeting at the same time. According to the survey of #voicesofyouth, Xiao Yu, 16 years old, China said: “Compared with normal schooling, online learning is less effective to me. Also, I miss my friends, staying at home for such a long time is so boring".
To sum up, using Facebook for online learning was such a great idea for this harsh time because students can not go to school right now. By using this online platform, of course, brings back a lot of problems, whether it advantages or disadvantages, it depends on the learner's awareness.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-12-10 | Trần Ánh Vy | 84 | view |
| 2024-11-17 | zanzendegi | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-10 | Giang Tran | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-07 | nhub2409785 | 73 | view |
| 2024-11-06 | nhatkhang111 | 78 | view |
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 183, Rule ID: LEARN_NNNNS_ON_DO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'to'?
Suggestion: to
...en compared with the other learning app like Zoom. On the dashboard page of Zoom, te...
^^^^
Line 5, column 533, Rule ID: EN_UNPAIRED_BRACKETS
Message: Unpaired symbol: '”' seems to be missing
...uth, Xiao Yu, 16 years old, China said: “Compared with normal schooling, online l...
^
Line 7, column 269, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'learners'' or 'learner's'?
Suggestion: learners'; learner's
...ges or disadvantages, it depends on the learners awareness.
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, first, furthermore, if, so, well, for example, of course, as a result, as well as, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 341.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21700879765 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29722995808 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85563047911 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 210.0 176.041082164 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.615835777126 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 538.2 506.74238477 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 27.1942900581 49.4020404114 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 104.647058824 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0588235294 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.23529411765 7.06120827912 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.388701424486 0.244688304435 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.110585117937 0.084324248473 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0698884707897 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2396912905 0.151304729494 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0437549224171 0.056905535591 77% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.58950901804 102% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.