In advertising, businesses nowadays usually emphasize their products are new in some ways. Why is this? Do you think it is a positive or negative development?
A tight correlation between advertisement and the prospect of a company has been accepted widely by most business managers and economic experts. With the aim to attract customers and augment profits for companies, polishing the products as the latest items do become a positive movement that is applied frequently into advertising.
First, it is no denial that the core purpose of striking the newest feature in publishing merchandise is to appeal to potential customers. The fact that companies endeavor to create a wider range of products to draw the attention of buyers indicates that they are attempting to build a stronger image in the eyes of consumers. People seem to believe that a company caring for its quality products is likely to manufacture new goods regularly; therefore, its reputation will swiftly increase. As the final result, that company obtains a higher chance in keeping loyal customers as well as drawing the attention of new potential ones, which is the greatest evidence to firmly claim for its positive effect.
What even more important is the desire to boost the company’s profits by continuously emphasizing the production of new items in advertising. It is conspicuous that humans tend to get fed up with old items so that they can throw obsolete things without hesitation; however, the opposite is true when a never-tried product appears in the market. Some new features added creates the feeling to experience of buyers so they will rush to acquire it without caring for prices. That is exactly what the producers wish to achieve. It is because the sales figure will unstoppably rise right after the launch of that product. Apple is an exemplary example when it repeatedly announces to publish new technological devices in a certain period in a year. Even though the differences among iPhone products are tiny, the company still receives a huge amount of profit every time their items are initially in the market by this strategy. Hence, the growth of Apple in business does prove the correctness of this movement.
In conclusion, advertising the good as a new one is certainly a positive development, which brings not only revenue but also customers to the company.
- 12 Governments should make people responsible for looking after their own localenvironment Do you agree or disagree 84
- The chart below shows the annual number of rental and sales in various formats of films from a particular store between 2002 and 2011 Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- The bar charts illustrate the average house expenses in England and its capital city London and to present the comparison regarding the average house prices between distinct areas of England within the year 2013 78
- The plans below show the site of an airport now and how it will look after redevelopment next year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statements Because people are busy doing so many different things they do very few things well Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 333, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...is applied frequently into advertising. First, it is no denial that the core pur...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, hence, however, if, so, still, therefore, well, in conclusion, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 14.0 7.30460921844 192% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1842.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 362.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08839779006 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.36191444098 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84115988526 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 211.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582872928177 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 588.6 506.74238477 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.958869665 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.8 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1333333333 20.7667163134 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.06666666667 7.06120827912 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183081836642 0.244688304435 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0549688969498 0.084324248473 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0329519035955 0.0667982634062 49% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.1055129832 0.151304729494 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0280355312365 0.056905535591 49% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 50.2224549098 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.54 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.62 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 78.4519038076 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.