Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily. Do you agree or disagree?
These days, the amount of air traffic is growing, therefore increasing the environment pollution. some people argue that power institutions ought to increase the taxes on airplane companies; however, I completely disagree with this statement.
Firstly, there is no doubt that the government should impose ‘’green taxes’’ on aircraft companies. However, dramatically increasing the taxes it raises the ticket price that leads to reducing of an income from tourism because tourists would not afford to have holidays far away from home. In other words, the key part of passengers, who travel by plane, choose low-cost flights in recent years. For example, countries such as Maldives and Seychelles largely rely on income received from tourism and many citizens work in this sector. if decline significantly the number of tourists in these countries, it would be a huge risk for people to lose the jobs.
Secondly, it is well known that cars, which is the most popular transport means in many countries, mostly have contributed to air pollution, because their engines emit CO2 into the atmosphere. By taxing aircrafts, it does not help to decrease a huge amount of CO2 in the environment. Some airplane companies, for instance, provide an opportunity for passengers to choose additionally pay ‘’green taxes’’ if they want.
Finally, it is clear that these days plethora of goods have exported and imported in many countries by plane. When increasing taxes for airplane companies, it might raise the price of things such as food, computer devices and other stuff. Similarly, it may grow the costs of services. A good illustration is dentist service that the specialists have ordered the main equipment from countries as Germany and Switzerland.
In conclusion, I would state, in my opinion, that reducing air traffic by taxing companies it does not decline air pollution, but more increase people’s dissatisfaction due to losing jobs in the tourism and increasing the costs of goods.
- In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines for very fast trains between cities. Other believe the money should be spent on improving existing public transport.Discuss both the 73
- Some experts believe that it is better for children to begin learning a foreign language at primary school rather than secondary school. Do the advantages of this outweight the disadvantages? 73
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010.Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features, and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in English who were able to speak other languages in addition to English, in 2000 and 2010. 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations. Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by tax 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 99, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...e increasing the environment pollution. some people argue that power institutions ou...
^^^^
Line 3, column 121, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: However
...axes'' on aircraft companies. however, dramatically increasing the taxes it r...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 556, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: If
... and many citizens work in this sector. if decline significantly the number of tou...
^^
Line 5, column 285, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
... huge amount of CO2 in the environment. some airplane companies, for instance, provi...
^^^^
Line 7, column 33, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'days'' or 'day's'?
Suggestion: days'; day's
...ant. Finally, it is clear that these days plethora of goods have exported and imp...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, finally, first, firstly, however, if, may, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1723.0 1615.20841683 107% => OK
No of words: 317.0 315.596192385 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.43533123028 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15532483181 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 176.041082164 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577287066246 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 519.3 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.9545669354 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.866666667 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.7667163134 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.5333333333 7.06120827912 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.01903807615 100% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.254519804624 0.244688304435 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0771947986927 0.084324248473 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0723007197807 0.0667982634062 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156986305416 0.151304729494 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.084419678447 0.056905535591 148% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 13.0946893788 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.