Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.
Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it more heavily.
Do you agree or disagree?
Regarding the rapid increase of air traffic, which is harmful not only for the environment but also for people that are annoyed by its noise, it is commonly believed that the government should be stricter on airoplanes’ taxes to discourage travellers from reckless use of air transportation. Even though this could be a solution, I believe that air traffic could be reduced with proper organisation and control of flights.
Indeed, increasing taxes could set a solution if the extra charges were carefully applied to people who unnecessarily use aeroplanes for their travelling. The government could achieve this by assessing the purpose of travelling of each passenger. In that way, taxes will discourage passengers, such as those of low-cost companies from exploiting the situation for having vacations.
However, the alternative of personal charges is highly unlikely to be applied properly, in comparison to other methods that could reduce air traffic. One practical solution could be the improvement of timetables of all means of transport by the government, in order to reduce the number of flights as much as possible. Conducting deep research on the demand for transportation would be the key to this attempt, which would eventually lead to avoidance of unnecessary travelling, as happens with passengers that have to take two planes to reach their destination.
Meanwhile, the government can reduce some of the drawbacks of air traffic, namely the irritating noise along with the environmental damage. Taking stricter measures regarding the maintenance of crafts is essential, as the legislation that concerns air companies is not sufficient. Furthermore, often checks on the level of pollution caused or other important parameters, followed by heavy fines in case of delinquency would deter companies from inappropriate use of planes.
Undoubtfully, air traffic is continuously increasing causing harm to the environment, as well as people. The government should interfere directly by improving daily timetables and advancing aircraft to restrict the further damage.
- The table shows the Proportions of Pupils Attending Four Secondary School Types Between Between 2000 and 2009.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise, pollution, and airport construction. One reason for this is the growth in low-cost passenger flights, often to holiday destinations.Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxi 84
- The bar chart shows the number of times per week (in 1000s), over five weeks, that three computer packages were downloaded from the internet.Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 84
- The chart below shows the amount of money per week spent on fast foods in Britain. The graph shows the trends in consumption of fast foods.Write a report for a university lecturer describing the information shown below. 78
- Smoking not only harms the smoker, but also those who are nearby. Therefore, smoking should be banned in public places.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 38, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
... Meanwhile, the government can reduce some of the drawbacks of air traffic, namely the ir...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 24.0651302605 66% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1778.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 318.0 315.596192385 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.59119496855 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.22286093782 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20137524343 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581761006289 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 543.6 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.1732919632 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.769230769 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4615384615 20.7667163134 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.46153846154 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.28540815822 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0952526654476 0.084324248473 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0589261588454 0.0667982634062 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152502904577 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556522584227 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 12.4159519038 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.09 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.