All the cars that burn fossil fuels should be banned and electric cars should replace them. Do you agree or disagree?
Due to drastic increase in private vehicles which lead to lots of complications related to our environment hurdles as well as health obstacles. However, in the future, hole the cars who are consuming petroleum and diesel substituted by an electric cars. Moreover, I strongly agree with the perception because these cars are environmental friendly and economic, saves the time, comfortable as well.
The main prospective to support this notion is that it is beneficial for the globe, our atmosphere and natives to utilise an electric cars rather than burning fossil fuels cars. In addition to this, an electric cars are environmental friendly and never release perilous gases in an environment. On the other hand, cars which started by using petrol/ diesel are spreading harmful toxic gases who not only detrimental for humans but also animals. Adding in this, these dangerous gases are the factors to pollute air and organisers of so many respiratory ailments such as asthma, cancer and etcetera. Even though, cars that burn fossil fuels who left steams and harmful gases which mixed in the air and dramatically reduce the level of oxygen. In contrast, an electric cars are helpful to keep our nature, surrounding and never rise an amount of global warming. For example, in India, regime decided to use 100% an electric cars in the palace of operating fossil fuels cars by 2030.
Furthermore, the another major benefit to run an electric cars as compared with consuming fuel cars is that these help masses to consume their times and offer comfortable drives. Additionally, everyone can reach their destinations quickly to expand an electric cars the reason is that they have faster in speed, not any worry about traffic congestion and give comfort rides. Moving further, an electric cars provide aid people to enhance the conditions of their economy because these cars are less expensive than other cars. Likewise, cars that on fossil fuels are more expensive and poor persons never eligible to buy any one. Last but not least, the maintenance of an electric cars are cheaper rather than petroleum and diesel operating cars. For instance, tax credits and subsidies to an electric cars ‘ owners announced by the authorities of USA.
In conclusion, although, an amount of fossil fuels are escalating day by day but expand of an electric cars are more better for people. Apart from this, these cars gradually decline the level of pollution in the air, remains times as well as wealth and providing so many advantages in several manners.
- More robots are being used at home and work place. Do you think this is a negative or positive trend? 67
- In many cities today, most people live in a large apartments blocks. Does this kind of accommodation have more advantages or disadvantages? 78
- The diagram shows the process of making coffee Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 21
- The two pie chart below shows the percentage of industry sectors’s contribution to the economy of Turkey in 2000 and 2016. Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant. 73
- The graph below shows the consumption of fish and some different kinds of meat in a European country between 1979 and 2004. 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 9, column 620, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
... and poor persons never eligible to buy any one. Last but not least, the maintenance of...
^^^^^^^
Line 13, column 113, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'better' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: better
... day but expand of an electric cars are more better for people. Apart from this, these cars...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, likewise, moreover, so, well, apart from, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 10.4138276553 173% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2145.0 1615.20841683 133% => OK
No of words: 418.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.13157894737 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.52162009685 4.20363070211 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64128267462 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.519138755981 0.561755894193 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 676.8 506.74238477 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.0360623599 49.4020404114 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 119.166666667 106.682146367 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2222222222 20.7667163134 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.0555555556 7.06120827912 142% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259065473032 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103629146511 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0549144931666 0.0667982634062 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.169621540691 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0493793199139 0.056905535591 87% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.77 12.4159519038 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.