Technology and science has grown beyond boundaries, recent research and constant thirst for knowledge among young individuals has led to further widening of scope of science. Government funding and constant support has made space explorations feasible and approachable with new inventions, yet i believe spending money on space exploration is complete waste and these funds could be utilized for other causes.
Each year, government funds are raised towards various causes, research and space projects constitute a portion of these funds. In spite of the meager amount spent on the space shuttles, it should not be contradicted as to how this money could be utilized towards other basic projects. Developing countries need funding towards national schemes like vaccinations, safe water supplies, basic government funded education for children, monthly food supplies at lower costs. Some of these projects are more essential than space schemes.
Furthermore, it has been noticed the disparity that exists between the pays of astronauts in space and other individuals who work towards welfare of other humans. The pay roll could be revised and those savings could be used for betterment of society. It is not uncommon to notice how the rural areas in developing and under developed nations suffer at the hands of explicit biasness on expenditures made on various other unnecessary projects.
Space development is essential for the nation but not at the cost of omitting basic amenities. The under privileged and lower scio economic sector should be addressed first, provide them necessary measures and basics for their upliftment than wasting money on space research.
- Young people are much more aware of and concerned about issues like the environment, poverty and animal welfare than previous generations. What is your own opinion? 89
- The charts below show how selected age groups purchased concert, cinema and theatre tickets online over the first three months of 2006 in three countries and how the internet was accessed. 58
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London. 73
- With all the problems in the world today, spending money on space exploration is a complete waste. The money could be better spent on other causes. 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems. To what extent do you agree or disagree?What measures do you think might be effective? 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
Technology and science has grown beyond ...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 300, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...d approachable with new inventions, yet i believe spending money on space explora...
^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... could be utilized for other causes. Each year, government funds are raised t...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e more essential than space schemes. Furthermore, it has been noticed the dis...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... various other unnecessary projects. Space development is essential for the n...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ovide them necessary measures and basics for their upliftment than wasting money ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, furthermore, if, so, as to, in spite of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74337843413 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.612403100775 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 430.2 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 16.0721442886 68% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.5912215639 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.0 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4545454545 20.7667163134 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.06120827912 66% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.273962895758 0.244688304435 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10228120545 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106372521815 0.0667982634062 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164288127866 0.151304729494 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.055962053305 0.056905535591 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.2 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.67 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.