Although there is a lot of translation software available, learning a language still could be advantageous. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Language is said to be more interesting when we completely understand by studying it than only being translated though developed apps or facilities. I totally agree with this opinion and I think we should notice the advantages of studying a language.
Translation equipment has popularly become essential factors due to the variety of languages. Therefore, many organizations have carried out an impressively huge numbers of translation software to satisfy the upward necessities of worldwide users. For instance, Cambridge Online Dictionary or Oxford Online Dictionary have been developed for many purposes such as translating weird vocabulary or listening to those pronunciations. According to the studies of researchers, there is an ascending trend of using translation apps. However, taking so many advantages of those softwares will not as effective as the process of trying our best to understand a new language crystal clear.
I completely support the opinion that making efforts to study foreign language brings uncountable amounts of benefits which are progressively useful for our future. For example, when going abroad, we will confidently communicate with natives without receiving helps from those kinds of translations facilities. We rarely make a fluent conversation only by searching the meaning of the words. With that special investigation, which is learning language, not only can we earn a living, but also we can build our mind through the infinitive knowledge of the language we are studying. And if we thoroughly learn a language, we can absolutely improve our value physically and mentally.
In conclusion, I agree that knowing a language will be significantly vital though there are so many kinds of translation equipment which are in use.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-26 | Neferti | 84 | view |
| 2023-07-20 | minhphambinh1234 | 84 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 78 | view |
| 2023-04-14 | Sang Sang Sang | 56 | view |
| 2023-03-23 | KhoaLe | 78 | view |
- Nowadays the way many people interact with each other has changed because of technology In what ways has technology affected the types of relationships people make Has this become a positive or negative development 89
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- Increasing the price of petrol is the best way to solve growing traffic and pollution problems To what extent do you agree or disagree What other measures do you think might be effective 78
- The chart below shows how frequently people in the USA ate in fast food restaurants between 2003 and 2013 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, so, therefore, for example, for instance, i think, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 41.998997996 74% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1498.0 1615.20841683 93% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.50735294118 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1784358708 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 176.041082164 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.606617647059 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 506.74238477 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8438613612 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.230769231 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.9230769231 20.7667163134 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.06120827912 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153268848215 0.244688304435 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0574500541714 0.084324248473 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.039336428626 0.0667982634062 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.110110197994 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0355812825893 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 50.2224549098 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.68 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 78.4519038076 106% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.78957915832 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.