Broadcasting of sport events is very common in the twenty-first century. Some scientists think that the amount of coverage will increase in the following decades, since there is a demand for it. They also consider it will have a negative impact on live sport matches. In my opinion, there are more advantages than disadvantages of the televised sports.
First of all, broadcasting is very convenient financially for spectators who live far from a place of the match. They do not have to spend money on the way and accommodation. They simply have to install sport channels instead.
Moreover, there is greater variety of matches on TV. If people buy a ticket on the particular sport event, they will not pay attention on other ones. When the TV-content is analyzed, there are lots of special sport channels which offer diversity of programmes and kinds of sport.
On the other hand, broadcasting of the sports is a problem for small sport clubs. They are suffering financial losses and becoming unpopular nowadays. Fewer people also attend live matches enjoying to watch ones in comfort of their homes. As a result, the cost of tickets has increased recently. This is also a dramatical situation for large stadiums. Some sports analysts think they will not be mostly filled with people soon and there will be no necessity of large stadiums.
In conclusion, I think sport broadcasting offers more opportunities than discomfort to spectators. I agree with some media analysts that it has changed the nature of sports forever, but this impact is mostly positive.
- the amount of sport shown on television every week has increased significantly and this is having an impact on live sports events. Do you think the benefits of having more televised sport are greater than the disadvantages? 56
- the amount of sport shown on television every week has increased significantly and this is having an impact on live sports events. Do you think the benefits of having more televised sport are greater than the disadvantages? 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, moreover, so, i think, in conclusion, as a result, first of all, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 41.998997996 79% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 8.3376753507 36% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1314.0 1615.20841683 81% => OK
No of words: 259.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.07335907336 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01166760082 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79339827016 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.563706563707 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 398.7 506.74238477 79% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 25.8932399777 49.4020404114 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 73.0 106.682146367 68% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.3888888889 20.7667163134 69% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.61111111111 7.06120827912 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.345829190806 0.244688304435 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103420747002 0.084324248473 123% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.068983652494 0.0667982634062 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19915798057 0.151304729494 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0638211405192 0.056905535591 112% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.6 13.0946893788 73% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 50.2224549098 131% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 11.3001002004 67% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.53 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.54 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.0 9.78957915832 61% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.7795591182 74% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.