Belching and unauthorized behavior is unacceptable in modern offices. How far you support this view? Give your response with justification.
In today's era of modern professional ethics and code of conduct, belching and unauthorized behavior is considered unacceptable. But, there is also a counter-argument among some sections of the community that belching being biological and should not be considered inappropriate behavior. However, I believe this topic is very sensitive and needs immense scrutiny before concluding.
We have a plethora of reasons to conclude that unauthorized behavior is a punishable offense. Activities such as accessing other's personal information, bullying of co-employees, leaking confidential documents can cause financial and reputational loss to organizations. Belching is a biological process of releasing air and sound from the stomach which can make people around us uncomfortable.
On the contrary, there are some arguments from human rights commissions that contend that any of these unauthorized behaviors should not be punished as this may lead to trauma among employees. Further, leading to the suffering of their entire family. Employees should be educated enough on harm due to such illicit behaviors and how it can damage the organization. They should be given enough opportunities to prove their intention and innocence. Belching and farting are completely biological processes that humans may or may not have control over. These should be scrutinized keeping cultures and backgrounds employees belong to. With the ever-growing global opportunities, people from several economic backgrounds and countries are traveling to other countries and are not fully aware of socially accepted behaviors in modern society and so in offices.
Considering all the details provided above, I believe employees exhibiting unauthorized behaviors should be punished. However, belching should be given an exception. Organizations should build strong awareness programs for employees to educate them enough on what are unauthorized and socially accepted behavior and how these can impact their colleagues.
- Positive And Negative Effects Of Technology Information Through Mass Media 56
- University only requires to apply digital media rather than continuously upgrading textbook Agree or disagree 84
- Truth is very important in human relations. discuss. 61
- Most alcoholics purchase liquor legally. According to your point of view, should stores in general be legally allowed to sell liquor to alcoholics? 84
- Medical technology can increase life expectancy Is it a blessing or a curse 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1702.0 1615.20841683 105% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.84879725086 5.12529762239 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24524918628 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 176.041082164 97% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587628865979 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.2854805572 49.4020404114 100% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.375 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1875 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.3125 7.06120827912 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 3.9879759519 201% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157412261763 0.244688304435 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0541240687697 0.084324248473 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0430911463678 0.0667982634062 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104253527578 0.151304729494 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0302514208056 0.056905535591 53% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.65 12.4159519038 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.06 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 78.4519038076 130% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.