The best way to educate children is by using internet in every lesson. To what extent do you share this opinion ? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children ?
Using internet in all subjects is the best method to educate children. Some analysis will show that it is not the best way in all lessons and that other options are preferable to teach young people.
Firstly, we should ask what the purpose of using internet in all lessons would be. It may be true that using internet, especially skype, offers a convenience to distance learning program. Nevertheless, in the long term it would affect children who communicate regularly to others via internet not able to communicate with face to face fluently. For example, in some lessons which need speech and presentation skills, perhaps children would become lack of confidence to face the audience if they used internet, as communication method, frequently in their education system. Secondly, it seems that using internet is an accessible way to find information on a huge variety of topic that children need. However, not all sources on the internet can be trusted. This may lead to students using false information without knowing.
Turning to possible alternatives, Probably the most effective would be to directly undertake the practice for any lessons that need it, such as sport and painting. This would generate improved rates of learning and more efficient use of the vast amount of practical studies available. In addition, Another possible option would be to enhance the availability of school library for academic research to educate students by autonomous learning, allowing students to sharpen self-study skills. Both these alternatives would be comparatively safe for children and would be more helpful to enhance confidence in applying their lesson.
In summary, It is logical to conclude that using internet has limited effectiveness because it may be to reduce children’s confidence in communication and provide the wrong information. Additionally, Not only would directly undertake the practice be more effective, but improvement in availability of school library also would appear to be far more robust alternative these days for children’s education.
- The bar chart below shows information about water use worldwide (Km3) from three different sectors between 1910 and 2010. 84
- The consumption of the world’s resources (oil, and water etc.) is increasing at a dangerous rate. What are causes and solutions? 78
- The graphs below depict the GDP expenditure of the UAE on two different items (1985-1993) and the rate of infant mortality and of life expectancy in the same place between 1970 and 1992. 78
- The graph below depicts the demand for electricity in England during typical days in winter and summer. The pie chart below shows how electricity is used in an average home in the same country. 84
- The diagram below shows how a central heating system in ahouse works 76
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to program'
Suggestion: to program
...fers a convenience to distance learning program. Nevertheless, in the long term it woul...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 205, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ide the wrong information. Additionally, Not only would directly undertake the pr...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, for example, in addition, in summary, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 19.0 7.85571142285 242% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1759.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 323.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.44582043344 5.12529762239 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23936324884 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03523070697 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.557275541796 0.561755894193 99% => OK
syllable_count: 558.0 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.6838997228 49.4020404114 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.266666667 106.682146367 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5333333333 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289905161377 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109915392831 0.084324248473 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0632488133546 0.0667982634062 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.194451015894 0.151304729494 129% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0810239788214 0.056905535591 142% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.33 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.18 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 78.4519038076 117% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.