‘The best way to educate children is by using the Internet in every lesson.’
To what extent do you share this opinion? What other ways are there of making lessons effective for children?
In today's modern world, educational authorities make a frantic attempt to employ high-technology devices top educate students more efficiently. The idea of using the Internet in each lesson and course may be initially appealing, but some analysis will show that it is not the key method and that other options are preferable.
Firstly, we should ask what the purpose of enjoying the Internet in each of children's lessons would be. It may be true that it makes students access information conveniently and swiftly; nevertheless, they may consider this data overload. This takes a great deal of time and effort for children to select and recognize what, which and how much of them are required, which can cause them to feel perplexing and end up becoming disinterested in the subject. Secondly, it must be said that considering the Internet as a valid source of information is quite the wrong way of collecting data. This is because students can very easily acquire inaccurate or out-dated information online. Finally, while searching for information needed, children may face unsuitable content (e.g., violent and pornographic materials) and harmful adults (e.g., pedophiles), which has a knock-on effect on young learners such as academic failure.
On the subject of alternatives, probably the most effective would be to improve schools' labs so that students can more engage in a practical way of learning practically. This provides children with a useful experience of what they are studying rather than imagining them, which would develop their practical work. Another viable option would be increased scientific excursions, would have the benefits of ranging from face-to-face instruction and facilitating learning and communication top creating memories with their classmates. Take a real visit from the Egyptian pyramids for their history course rather than a virtual tip as a clear example.
To conclude, we have seen that using the Internet as a core educational technique for young learners in every lesson is of limited effectiveness because of its 'side effects'. Practical work and scientific trips would appear to be far more robust alternatives.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-13 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | ahmadrava88 | 89 | view |
- The charts below show that results of a survey of adult education. The first chart shows the reasons why adults decide to study. The pie chart shows how people think the cost of adult education should be shared. 84
- The graph below shows UK acid rain emissions, measured in millions of tones, from four different sectors between 1990 and 2007. 73
- It is more important for schoolchildren to learn about local history than world history. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 78
- Some people believe that studying at university or college is the best route to a successful career, while others believe that it is better to get a job straight after school.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 89
- Some people feel that boarding schools (where students or pupils live at the school during the term) are an excellent option for children, while other people disagree for a number of reasons. Consider both sides of this debate and reach a conclusion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 127, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a practical way" with adverb for "practical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...s labs so that students can more engage in a practical way of learning practically. This provides ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, e.g., finally, first, firstly, if, may, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1825.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 339.0 315.596192385 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.38348082596 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.29091512845 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97596407852 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 205.0 176.041082164 116% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.604719764012 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 565.2 506.74238477 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.2975951904 118% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0569744768 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.357142857 106.682146367 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2142857143 20.7667163134 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.228917735486 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0755414120508 0.084324248473 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0578713113242 0.0667982634062 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13345260736 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.034409946287 0.056905535591 60% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.0 13.0946893788 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 38.66 50.2224549098 77% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 12.4159519038 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.76 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.1190380762 115% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.