The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.
To what extent do you agree or disagree?
During the past decades, the breakthroughs in manufacturing technology have resulted in mass production of vehicles. Consequently, today’s governments are intensifying tremendous efforts to tackle critical issues following the above advancement. However, there is controversy over which measure should be taken to address the problems successfully. Although I agree that the most effective method is to provide citizens with free public transportation on a daily basis, I believe this opinion has some potential drawbacks that need to be considered carefully.
On the one hand, there is no doubt that giving free access to transport plays a pivotal role in the reduction of massive congestion problems. This is because with the increasing number of people using mass transit, there will be a dramatic decrease in the traffic density, especially during rush hour. Moreover, in the long run, this approach will positively affect the public perception of public transit, which leads to the increase in the amount of public transport usage.
On the other hand, it can be clearly seen that the government which adopts such a method has to bear a heavy financial burden. For example, there is likelihood that the authorities will squander taxpayers’ money on the investment of vehicles and the upkeep of public transportation. Those huge amounts of capital may produce a more beneficial effect if they are invested in other important sectors such as education or health. Furthermore, even though free provision of mass transit may appear to be the most practical idea, other measures should be taken simultaneously to achieve the desired result. For instance, besides providing complimentary public transport, the government should execute extensive programs to raise public awareness of traffic congestion and its related issues.
In conclusion, although I think that free provision of public transportation would be the solution to the traffic jam issue, I suppose there are still weaknesses that need to be examined closely. My view is that governments need to be more flexible in their approaches in order to deal with such a problem successfully.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-01 | phuongnguyen01 | 78 | view |
| 2019-05-24 | Manpreet aujla | 56 | view |
| 2019-02-15 | PhuongLee | 67 | view |
| 2019-01-02 | hongthuy | 56 | view |
| 2018-09-21 | Tran Xuan Quoc | 84 | view |
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 56
- Not so many people use a bicycle although it has many benefits. Why? How to encourage people to use bicycles as a main transport? 78
- Some people believe government should spend money on building train and subway lines to reduce traffic congestion. Others think that building more and wider roads is the better way to reduce traffic congestion.Discuss both views and give your opinion. 73
- Traffic and accommodation problems are increasing and government should encourage some businesses to move from cities to rural areas. Does advantage outweigh the disadvantages? 84
- The best way for governments to solve the problem of traffic congestion is providing free public transport in 24 hours per day, and seven days a week.To what extent do you agree or disagree? 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 566, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...s that need to be considered carefully. On the one hand, there is no doubt that ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, consequently, furthermore, however, if, may, moreover, so, still, as to, for example, for instance, i suppose, i think, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 7.30460921844 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1832.0 1615.20841683 113% => OK
No of words: 335.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46865671642 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27820116611 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10317998139 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.579104477612 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 562.5 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 30.6388608783 49.4020404114 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 130.857142857 106.682146367 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.9285714286 20.7667163134 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8571428571 7.06120827912 182% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.172155541316 0.244688304435 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0584740611267 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0505621328667 0.0667982634062 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.106925582985 0.151304729494 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0114387998153 0.056905535591 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 13.0946893788 124% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.