The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree?
Recent decades have witnessed the upwards spectrum in the juvenile delinquency rate, raising many questions of the significance of parental skills. Although parental skills’ positive implications on youth crimes could be pronounced, I believe there are more effective alternative solutions.
On the other hand, it should be acknowledged that parental skills could minimize youth crimes. Specifically, parents with good parental skills would teach their children many moral codes or precepts conforming to the social norms. Therefore, young individuals would distinguish what is right or wrong in the society, acting as a deterrent for breeding future offenders.
On the other hand, I believe that official authorities could undertake more practical initiatives to combat this issue. First, the legislation of the prohibition of programmes with sexual or aggressive contents on both the mainstream and alternative media should be enacted. This is proved that these materials could culminate in some mental impairments in viewers, especially those at the young age, which is connected to their propensity for crime commissions in the future. In addition, governments should incentivise some outsourcing investment activities. This suggests a causal relationship with the construction of many highly-industrial parks with manufacturing factories, offering many employment opportunities with stable salary for young people, minimizing their possibilities to commit crimes to make ends meet.
In conclusion, I partially agree that parental skills mean a decline in the delinquency rate. However, there are many measures of higher efficiency that governments should conduct such as the censorship of X-rated and violent images on media or employment opportunities to eradicate this problem.
- As life expectancy is increasing, people work after retirement with pay. Alternatively, some people start to work at a young age. Are these positive or negative impacts? 93
- The graph shows Underground Station Passenger Numbers in London 89
- Rich countries should not employ skilled labour from poor countries as poor countries need the workers more Do you agree or disagree 80
- Some people think that killing animals for food is cruel, but others claim that animals are a necessary part of a diet. What is your opinion. 61
- It is impossible to help all people in the world, so governments should only focus on people in their own countries. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 11
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, so, therefore, in addition, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 24.0651302605 75% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1543.0 1615.20841683 96% => OK
No of words: 258.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98062015504 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00778971557 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22153652444 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.62015503876 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 469.8 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.0290887607 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.583333333 106.682146367 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.5 20.7667163134 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.41666666667 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.219587193012 0.244688304435 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0764057034898 0.084324248473 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627567479405 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133621122019 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0522967445236 0.056905535591 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 50.2224549098 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.4 12.4159519038 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 78.4519038076 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.