The best way to reduce youth crimes is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what extent you agree or disagree?
When it comes to crackdown on youth crimes, equipping parents with parental skills seems to be the best solution. From my perspective, while that can play an important role in eliminating young criminals, the most effective answer should be the combination with other alternatives.
On the one hand, there are certain reasons to believe that parents with good parental skills can minimize juvenile crimes. Parents are likely to have a great impact on children's behaviours. Crimes among juveniles, in fact, are mainly the result of inappropriate child rearing, lack of childcare and education about consequences of committing crimes. Therefore, offering courses which train parents skills such as to be good role models, to be good listeners or trustworthy friends of their children may be really necessary and helpful. By witnessing exemplary behaviours of their parents daily, children would be naturally shaped a perception of how they should behave as well as be more aware of avoiding being involved in crimes.
On the other hand, the influence of parents solely is not enough since it must be combined simultaneously with other methods to combat the issue. Either kids or adolescents nowadays spend much of their time at school hence they are also easily affected by their counterparts. For instance, in Vietnam, there are many cases students are implacated in violence, smoking, drinking alcohol by their friends at school and all of which are primary contributors to crimes at young age. On account of that, it is schools' responsibility to organize activities that can attract students plus educate them about adverse effects of committing crimes on themselves and the society.
In conclusion, I believe that educating parents about parental skills is an effective way to tackle the problem of juvenile delinquency yet it need to be carried out in accompany with others to achieve the best result.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 84 | view |
| 2019-08-06 | Duong Linh | 67 | view |
| 2019-07-29 | Duong Linh | 61 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | dkklinkkk | 56 | view |
| 2019-05-06 | dkklinkkk | 67 | view |
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, may, really, so, therefore, well, while, as to, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 13.1623246493 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 10.4138276553 67% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 55.0 41.998997996 131% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 305.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.27540983607 5.12529762239 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86012912622 2.80592935109 102% => OK
Unique words: 180.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590163934426 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 42.2975570611 49.4020404114 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.083333333 106.682146367 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.4166666667 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8333333333 7.06120827912 168% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.262328928212 0.244688304435 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10433427076 0.084324248473 124% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0717831236372 0.0667982634062 107% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.174933018526 0.151304729494 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0346372899826 0.056905535591 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.1 13.0946893788 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.64 12.4159519038 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.