The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Many people believe that raising fuel price is the best solution to tackle global environmental issues. In my view, we may not alleviate environmental problems effectively when we go up the cost of fuel. Instead of, there were many alternative options to protect our environment.
Clearly, the price of fuel has little to do with dealing with problems of pollution. The travelling and transportation of goods using private vehicles are inevitable demands because it might be very convenient and time-saving. Also, the fuel may be playing a significant role in industrial zones and residential areas, so people need to pay for it any cost to support their life and keep their work. Additionally, the fuel price rise is a primary reason to indirectly put up the cost of the majority of essential commodities, which lead to the difficulty in expenditure. As a result, this thing could easily trigger social disagreement and resentment.
On the other hand, I would suggest that there are more effective ways to tackle international environmental problems. Firstly, the government could implement certain regulations restricting the use of private vehicles such as cars, motorbikes and encourage people to use public transportation by increasingly collecting of the annual road maintenance fee. Secondly, the development substitute energy sources should be considered by utilizing green resources like wind and solar energy. Since they not only do not release pollutants into the environment but also are inexhaustible and sustainable energy sources.
In conclusion, I believe that heightening the price of fuel to solve global environmental issues is not a complete measure. Instead, the government may adopt alternative solutions whose the effectiveness should be considered carefully.
- The best way to resolve the international environmental problems is to increase the cost of fuel. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 67
- In many schools and universities, girls tend to choose arts subjects(eg. languages) and boys choose science subjects (eg. Physics). What do you think are the reasons? Do you think that this tendency should be changed? 78
- Some people say that what children watch influences their behaviour Others believe the amount of time they spend on television influences their behaviour most Discuss both view and give your opinion 92
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 181, Rule ID: WHOSE_DT[5]
Message: Did you mean 'who's'?
Suggestion: who's
...ernment may adopt alternative solutions whose the effectiveness should be considered ...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, in conclusion, such as, as a result, in my view, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 274.0 315.596192385 87% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.5401459854 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0685311056 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.25917926078 2.80592935109 116% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.63503649635 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.9708353551 49.4020404114 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.428571429 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5714285714 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.85714285714 7.06120827912 125% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196761846632 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0610755107662 0.084324248473 72% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531656306762 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109255066978 0.151304729494 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0461230368428 0.056905535591 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 13.0946893788 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 12.4159519038 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.65 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.